There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Any news about the upcomming Starfighter?
Now, if you were asking about the Phantom...Yes, the news is - there's no more news...Now, if you were asking about the Phantom...
Now, the Phantom - I haven't a clue where it's up to either... but it was a good question Matt 
So if any other developer out there had an F-4 in the works they should for sure go forward with it because they will most likely get a year's market time before the much anticipated A2A version "maybe" gets released. I hope someone/anyone is listening.The 104 is to the Phantom what the Spitfire was to the P-40: a testbed.
At least that's what was told by the A2A guys. So the 104 is supposed to come first, and it will be the first aircraft to show an Accusimed jet engine.
On the bad news, given the time it took for them to build the P-40 (and the time it still takes to build the Mustang) after the Spit, I don't think we'll see the 104 before next year, so the Phantom will probably appear somewhere in en 2013 or beginning 2014.
Yes, I want to die, too.
So if any other developer out there had an F-4 in the works they should for sure go forward with it because they will most likely get a year's market time before the much anticipated A2A version "maybe" gets released. I hope someone/anyone is listening.
:ernae:
Those are available in Pack 3 of Mark's Alphasim FS9 versions recently made freeware via Virtavia and they work pretty well "out of the box" in FSX. He may be working on rebuilding them for FSX from the ground up but I expect that will be a while as well. My point, and thank you hschuit, is that just because some company has been saying they are going to do something for the past couple years and then estimate it will be a couple more years before release that doesn't mean other developers with an interest should hold back. Get in there and own that market.Mark Harper's "ALS"was doing the British versions I believe with the better Spey engines (well I say their better lol).

So if any other developer out there had an F-4 in the works they should for sure go forward with it because they will most likely get a year's market time before the much anticipated A2A version "maybe" gets released. I hope someone/anyone is listening.
:ernae:
Well that really is the truth. Everything A2A has done has raised the bar higher than almost every other military aircraft. I can only think of one non-A2A military addon that is in the same class. Indeed the only other company that raises the bar as much as A2A is PMDG. They both simply produce the highest quality addons. They also demand a premium price and lengthy development times. In the end, they're well worth it and see far more use than any other planes in my hangar.it sounds like, just because it's from A2A, you expect it to be a better addon then anything allready available now

Sounds like you've never tried any Accusim planeNot sure why you specifically ask about an A2A F-104; it sounds like, just because it's from A2A, you expect it to be a better addon then anything allready available now; or the version it has if/when A2A releases an F-104.