• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

MilViz 737-200

fsafranek said:
Thanks for clearing that up. I just started reading this thread and was going to post that someone needs to do some more research. But you'd be suprised how many customers wouldn't have a clue that there was a difference.
:ernae:
Click to expand...

As you can see from Gunnar's post #34, the separate models have now been compiled. The first image is of the "normal gear" and the subsequent images are of the a/c with the gravel kit installed.
 
A few more exterior shots....

First Air C-GNWN
1.jpg


3.jpg


JANET Airline N5294M
21.jpg


25.jpg
 
I'd like to discuss those very nice looking JANET paints for your 737 with you...
But first I need you to stare at the little red light on top of this device. :pop4:

View attachment 62318 :icon_twi:

(Really looking forward to this one, looks great!)
 
Dain Arns said:
I'd like to discuss those very nice looking JANET paints for your 737 with you... :icon_twi:

(Really looking forward to this one, looks great!)
Click to expand...


There's been a red stripe 'Janet" 737 in one of the Delta Tech Ops Hangars in Atlanta for the last week. I've seen it a few times while taxiing to 26L, and it appears to be getting a C check.
 
I had the "People complain about sales in this market and they're doing another 737?" reaction too. But then I saw the shots, and combined with MilViz's usual quality, I'll be picking this up if the price isn't too PMDGish. :)

Besides, I've always loved the look of the 737-200. (Much more than flying in them, ugh.) You should do a "for fun" model where you throw a giant bubble canopy on top and paint it in an Me-262 scheme! That's what the -100/200 series always looked like to me. "We have to compete with the DC-9, and we don't have time to design a new airliner from scratch!" "Well, we have these captured German plans sitting around... Multiply every number by 8 and put a cockpit in front!"
 
A case has been made that Boeing took the general proportions including the wing sweep from the 262. I think the real reason that the pods are tucked closely to the wing has to do with the desire to keep the gear short and the engines fairly close inboard for single engine controllability. This has bit them a bit as the airframe has attempted to grow.

Cheers: T
 
Bone said:
There's been a red stripe 'Janet" 737 in one of the Delta Tech Ops Hangars in Atlanta for the last week. I've seen it a few times while taxiing to 26L, and it appears to be getting a C check.
Click to expand...

Give me a heads up next time you're in ATL!

Diego
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top