• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

182 FDE support needed

B

bstolle

No longer active
Hi folks,

If you are interested in a very high quality FDE for the new Carenado 182 FDE I could really use your help, as I was surprised that I couldn't find any pilot reports on the internet.
Any link or personal 182 experience from you guys would help.
My 182 experience isn't really relevant as it's approx 30 ago that I flew a 182.
AFAIK the 182 has been developed from the 180/185.
So if some of you have the Carenado 182 or the 185 (new FDE) any input would be appreciated about the differences.
I even looked at the default 172, the (fs9) RealAir 172, and the Aerofly FS 172.
If someone knows an active 182 pilot who could do a few real tests, this would be great of course!

Best regards

Bernt
 
I was going to reply to this on bushpounders Bernt, but the forum software is cacked up for me so....

Contrasting with the original carenado 182, it needs a way stiffer shock on the nose gear, and the brakes are a tad odd... way too sharp. You know cessna's toebrakes aren't the stiffest I'm sure.

I've had chance to fly a 182q, but not a turbo as this is... so its highly likely that its a totally different perspective, but anyway...

Contrasting with a 172, it felt stiffer... heavier, as though a pendulum was suddenly larger in turns, but with increased power making that weight feel more agile. It was stiffer in sideslips, and quite cumbersome in the flare from what I recall... like you had to drag its nose skyward to ensure things touched properly.
I don't have much time with them, so this is just personal feelings from what i did notice.
 
Firekitten said:
quite cumbersome in the flare from what I recall... like you had to drag its nose skyward to ensure things touched properly.
I don't have much time with them, so this is just personal feelings from what i did notice.
Click to expand...

Nothing recent for me either, but that is my memory of them too.

-steve
 
Bernt:

Unfortunatly my 182 expereince is about 30 years ago as well, though I remember it as a really nice smooth, solid and fairly fast plane. More recent experience in 185's and 180's. That was back in an era when a checkout consisted of reading the manual, such as it was, and there's the plane, have at it.....

Cheers: Tom
 
Thanx for the response. That's pretty much how I remember the 182 as well and gives me a nice picture of how the 'new' one should behave...
Got the manual and all the necessary technical data, but that alone would be too little to simulate the personality of the 182.

Best regards

Bernt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top