Update of F-111 from JF

[YoYo]

Waiting of F-111 from http://www.f111-fsx.com/ but Just Flight shows new pictures of incoming his F-111:

Looks better and better: http://justflight.com/product/f111-aardvark-boxed

 

[StormILM]

The screens on the site look pretty good on the externals and VC but I'd pose the question to JF if the wings and wing animations are visible from the VC? This was the major reason I elected against the Virtavia model(the lack of these views/animations). I am concerned the FSX F-111 probably won't feature the views/animations either as video/screens seem to indicate that plus myself and others haven't gotten a response out of that team when asked about it. As far as I am concerned, all three DEV groups models & VC's look great, just hoping at least one gets the full treatment in the area of concern mentioned.

 

[Warrant]

Great shots, great aircraft. Although i will most likely purchase it, i wonder why there a so many double developments while so many modern jets are not developed at all?
A shortlist of some birds very much wanted;

F-4 (all variants)
F-5 (variants with variable weapon load and manufacture)
SU-30 and up (all variants, especially dual seats)
Mig-29
Su-25
EF-2000
Rafale


Helo's:
Eurocopter Tigre
Mil-24 Hind (all variants)
Mil-17 (all variants)

Cargo:

All Antonov's

And the list is much mucht longer.

But then again, nice work on the 111 :salute:

 

[Ian Warren]

Being a 111 Fan since 73 , This JF - the developers of F111 is screaming animations , textures .... i have a very sore head just bumping into it .. It is the best ever <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input jscode="leoInternalChangeDone()" onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

 

[StormILM]

Great shots, great aircraft. Although i will most likely purchase it, i wonder why there a so many double developments while so many modern jets are not developed at all?
A shortlist of some birds very much wanted;

F-4 (all variants)
F-5 (variants with variable weapon load and manufacture)
SU-30 and up (all variants, especially dual seats)
Mig-29
Su-25
EF-2000
Rafale


Helo's:
Eurocopter Tigre
Mil-24 Hind (all variants)
Mil-17 (all variants)

Cargo:

All Antonov's

And the list is much mucht longer.

But then again, nice work on the 111 :salute:

There are two F-5's, the Virtavia(Alphasim) and the Fly-the TigerX. I had the latter in FS9 and it's a great model.

Roland's Rafale is nice, I bought it the day it was released but sadly it got yanked over the dispute with Dassault which will hopefully be resolved at some point.

There were a couple of EF-2000's being worked on but not sure what happened with them.

There is a Mi-24 in development which was mentioned recently here.

There are already some good Antonov's out and one more coming(AN-24 native).

I have a feeling that unless we get a big surprise, we aren't going to see a Mig-29, SU-25 or 30 anytime soon but who knows.

I am a Phantom lover as well. Hopefully time will bring one to us again.

As far as a Vark is concerned, I only want one good one!

 

[Cirrus N210MS]

looking amazing

 

[Martyn]

The screens on the site look pretty good on the externals and VC but I'd pose the question to JF if the wings and wing animations are visible from the VC? This was the major reason I elected against the Virtavia model(the lack of these views/animations). I am concerned the FSX F-111 probably won't feature the views/animations either as video/screens seem to indicate that plus myself and others haven't gotten a response out of that team when asked about it. As far as I am concerned, all three DEV groups models & VC's look great, just hoping at least one gets the full treatment in the area of concern mentioned.

Yes you can see the wings/loadout/sweeping animation from the VC:

View attachment 70366


We'll have some preview videos available soon.

 

[StormILM]

Yes you can see the wings/loadout/sweeping animation from the VC:

View attachment 70366


We'll have some preview videos available soon.

One word---> SOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[YoYo]

Agree. Model looks very promising.

I hope it will be released soon.

 

[Carbine1]

Guys nice looking 111 you have there.

Just a little heads up for you, the main landing gear in image two is sitting way to proud, 111's really squat down on their mains.

Not sure if it's to late to resolve that or not, and please don't take it the wrong way. It just really stood out to me.

Looks like we will have three 111 models to pick from which is great.

Thanks for the heads up on this one.

Cheers.

 

[jeansy]

Hate to be picky but the Australian roundels are back to front The kangaroo heads to battle not runs away

 

[Martyn]

Hate to be picky but the Australian roundels are back to front The kangaroo heads to battle not runs away

No need to apologise - they'll be heading into battle on the finished product :salute:

 

[YoYo]

It will be only boxed product? No download version in too same time?

 

[Martyn]

It will be only boxed product? No download version in too same time?

A download and boxed version of this product will be available.

 

[Martyn]

Here is a preview video showing the virtual cockpit features:

 

[Stickshaker]

Hello Martyn,

Will the HUD be collimated?

 

[Martyn]

No I don't believe the HUD will be collimated on this aircraft.

 

[vora]

In the first seconds of the promo video you just posted a HUD is clearly visible on the upper edge of the screen?

 

[Martyn]

In the first seconds of the promo video you just posted a HUD is clearly visible on the upper edge of the screen?

I've edited my last post to make it clearer. I was replying ref the collimation, didn't mean to suggest that no HUD is included.

 

[Stickshaker]

That's clear, Martyn, thanks.