• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Add-ons are where its at!!

R

Rattler

Charter Member
Afternoon Ladies and Gents, Just wanted to Pop in and well just Put my 2 cents in.. I`m glad that The Add on aprt of FSX is Doing Great, So many New and Wonderful Aircraft Out and Set to come out, I am Still Looking forward to the Razbam S-3B in the Works!! and may I make a Suggestion or Comment, Has Anyone thought about Making an SU-34? There is just Something About it, Unique, Different, Ya know Just Out of the Box That bird is. Oh well Maybe some day, Just food for thought.View attachment 70916

View attachment 70917Keep your wings Level and your Belly side down!!View attachment 70918

http://youtu.be/9qZHjfQjqLg


http://youtu.be/W11JpnGuUoE
 
Always been a fan of Sukhoi aircraft. Named my second cat Sukhoi actually!

I'd love to see an Su-17!!

18430_big.jpg
 
Rattler said:
is there a manual in russian available?

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Fullback.html#mozTocId888790 is any of this useful?
Click to expand...

While there are some rare MFD shots in there - getting inside an Su-34 is anything but easy - they're of sufficiently low quality so as to prevent anything useful done with them. If the Cyrillic were readable, and there were a shot of the MFD menu page, it may have been possible to reverse engineer a "best guess" version of the aircraft's computer systems. While I would love an Su-34, I'd also like to see it done right, which probably won't happen anytime soon, given how secretive the Russians are with their latest combat platforms. Furthermore, it doesn't exactly have a unique mission profile that would be fun to fly without in-depth systems modelling - on the other hand, something like the Su-24 would be great fun to fly, having been designed for high speed, low altitude penetration flights...
 
An-225 said:
While there are some rare MFD shots in there - getting inside an Su-34 is anything but easy - they're of sufficiently low quality so as to prevent anything useful done with them. If the Cyrillic were readable, and there were a shot of the MFD menu page, it may have been possible to reverse engineer a "best guess" version of the aircraft's computer systems. While I would love an Su-34, I'd also like to see it done right, which probably won't happen anytime soon, given how secretive the Russians are with their latest combat platforms. Furthermore, it doesn't exactly have a unique mission profile that would be fun to fly without in-depth systems modelling - on the other hand, something like the Su-24 would be great fun to fly, having been designed for high speed, low altitude penetration flights...
Click to expand...

The Frogfoot... The Russian A-10 imo.... I remember that bird from my Lock on days.... That Would be a fun bird to fly for the yankers and bankers..... I still think an SU-34 is needed... I would imagine it would be on the order of an F-111 but a bit more agile.."Best Guess":salute:
:salute:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top