There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
I'm kind of confused with Alabeo. They started out doing interesting planes, but it seems they've converted over to doing what their sister company was doing and no longer do those interesting birds. Can we go back to what you started doing? Far more intrinsically interesting.
Sorry to start the comments negative.
I'm kind of confused with Alabeo. They started out doing interesting planes, but it seems they've converted over to doing what their sister company was doing and no longer do those interesting birds. Can we go back to what you started doing? Far more intrinsically interesting.
Sorry to start the comments negative.
And -sadly- the price is going higher and higher all the time... But even with that in mind, I am tempted. How would you compare this with the C402 and C441 from Fltsimware?
I have the Flysimware 402C. Comparing it to the screen shots of the Alabeo C404, the Alabeo looks quite a bit nicer. I'm interested to hear about systems modeling, flight dynamics and how the Alabeo C404 hits frame rates. The Flysimware 402 has pretty good systems and flight modeling given the confines of FSX and it actually does well on my aging computer, but it has a bad habit of inducing blurry scenery textures. I've even resized the 2048 textures down to 1024, but the Flysimware 402 really taxes my computer. I've wondered if part of the problem is all the separate gauge CAB files and things like the radios and GPS have independently modeled buttons, knobs, textures, etc.
The B-25 needs to be done to state-of-the-art specs as well as a dozen others I can think of.
There are two B-25s in development and one is reportedly getting close. The one getting close is from Vertigo Studios and John Terrell (Bomber_12th) is also working on a B-25. I think the former is a B-25J and the latter is a B-25C, I'm not completely sure, though. Of course, the H is the one I want, lol!
I would love to get the Alabeo C404 and the upcoming Navajo from Carenado, but their new planes create too many stutters on my system..
Decided to purchase it. It is a very nice addon, in my opinion. I've only had it up and about briefly, but I'm not seeing any readily apparent issues with it. Looks great, sounds great, and performs great. We really have nothing else like this in the sim yet, so it's refreshing to see. A civilian heavy piston twin.
Here's a few screenshots (postprocessed) around Nuuk, Greenland. Did a quick re-registration and re-flag on the default Aussie livery so I have a local example for the scenery. Scenery is FSDG-Nuuk: http://fsdg-online.com/sceneries/41-nuuk.html
![]()
![]()
![]()
The aircraft comes with a blank white livery, as well as two private US examples, one Brit (Ordnance Survey), one German (Hansa Luftbild), and one Aussie (seen here just with a re-reg and re-flag).
Looks like the shots were fairly compressed....hopefully you'll still get the gist of things. Also note that the product album on Alabeo's page has 50 images!
How do you like the NUUK scenery? Looks interesting, but a bit out of the way.