Bushpounder
SOH-CM-2026
You have to do a ski version. Those are VERY popular. Do you have more pictures to share? Looks nice so far!
Don
Don
-
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Milviz is working on a DHC-2 Beaver!
- Thread starter Tim-HH
- Start date
donnybalonny
Members +
Its great they make a bush plane. Thanks and thumbs up. BUT, the Aerosoft beaver is actually a very nice plane with good flight dynamics. As others here, I´ve had it since fs2004 and the FSX gets plenty of time in FSX and P3D.
I would soooooo much have prefered a good Norseman.
I would soooooo much have prefered a good Norseman.
>>the Aerosoft beaver is actually a very nice plane with good flight dynamics. As others here, I´ve had it since fs2004 and the FSX gets plenty of time in FSX and P3D.
but the vc is quite dated now so it would be great to have one with state-of-the-art graphics from Milviz.
but the vc is quite dated now so it would be great to have one with state-of-the-art graphics from Milviz.
Lane Street
Charter Member
While waiting for the MilViz model, it is quite easy to use the default VC with the Aerosoft model.
cheers,
Lane
Ditto here on the Nordyn Norseman.
Any aircraft with a name like that deserves to be modeled.
Cheers,
Mark
Any aircraft with a name like that deserves to be modeled.
Cheers,
Mark
Oh boy, oh boy.... I can't wait for this. Very excited.
Perhaps a successful Beaver will convince MV to explore bush planes a little more. That'd be superb.
(I've mentioned it before somewhere, but I have good photo access to a perfectly restored Noorduyn Norseman, and would be more than willing to spend time taking pics of details for any dev that would ask.)
Perhaps a successful Beaver will convince MV to explore bush planes a little more. That'd be superb.
(I've mentioned it before somewhere, but I have good photo access to a perfectly restored Noorduyn Norseman, and would be more than willing to spend time taking pics of details for any dev that would ask.)
DaveB
Charter Member
I don't want to pour scorn as I'm sure this will be stunning but I have a perfectly good Aerosoft Beaver I rarely fly that comes in so many versions.. I've had to get rid of them in the aircraft.cfg to improve 'Select Aircraft' load times!! A Norseman I'd be very interested in Honestly can't see why MV went for a Beaver but I'm sure they know what they're doing. Happily for me.. my card is safe
ATB
DaveB
Honestly can't see why MV went for a Beaver but I'm sure they know what they're doing. Happily for me.. my card is safeATB
DaveB
Epilogue: only one good DHC-3 Otter model residing in the MSFS crypts (possibly FS2K) then completely forgotten... These days you'd have to divert to XPlane to fly this great workhorse. Ashame really...
I'll take that new Beaver anyway ( great that Rob will do the FD's
) but i would've payed twice the price for a new Otter !
Alan_A
Charter Member
Well, you've got me as a customer based on that alone.
Though if you ever do get around to an Otter, I'll be right behind Javis in line for one.
Really looking forward to a Rob Young-tuned bushplane...
SRAces
Members +
Looking forward to this Beaver to replace the Aerosoft bird. I've been flying the Aerosoft version for quite some time. While it is a decent aircraft, it lacks the quality details. Looking for to the MU-2 as well and hope that it might move forward at some point. The Flysimware MU-2 isn't worth what they want for it.
henrystreet
Charter Member
A really nice Beaver model just came out for X-Plane...wondering if that model is related to the "fast track"? We've seen a lot of models go from FSX to X-Plane...would be a great boon to X-Plane devs to see a model go this direction.
cavaricooper
SOH-CM-2023
Portia911
Charter Member
Good point, I've also noticed the 'one-way traffic' from FSX to X-Plane. Be nice if the recent Norseman and Bandierante developed 'there' might find their way over 'here' in the near future!
donnybalonny
Members +
Exaxtly. Its impressing how the FSX "industry" always has to play safe with releases of the same old story again and again. (Highwing cessnas, Lowwing Pipers, Alaska and eastcoast US scenery etc. etc. etc. zzzzzz)
The Cessnas, Pipers, Beavers are important, but how many do we need?
Ahhh and that DHC-3 otter is a beauty. We need a classic single engine bushplane that is bigger than the Beaver.
snow_white
Charter Member
Same here. was really not interested in this from Milviz, till the name Rob Young surfaced, so now I just might get this one. (Still would have liked A2A accusim version), but this seem to will have to do for now.