Jafo
SOH-CM-2024
Huub ....for some strange reason I thought I was avoiding 312 paints.....and now I'm in a rut.You saved one of the best for last!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ages ago I thought...."nope, not that one...it's a 312 not a 314..." ...
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Please see this thread for updates. Update Thread
SOH ADMINISTRATIONHuub ....for some strange reason I thought I was avoiding 312 paints.....and now I'm in a rut.You saved one of the best for last!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jafo, this aircraft, ZF210 I believe has markings above/below wings.
I've found these off the net if any good.
http://www.andybright.com/prop/tucano0.jpg
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3702/12506322065_169f6d9a73_b.jpg
Maybe work on it after the Orlik.![]()
I think 210's one of the prettier...ima digging bumblebee 446
I think 210's one of the prettier...
The issue I have with these RAF versions is the 'translation' into a 314...deciding what to add from a 312...and what to retain that 'should' stay on it because it's still actually a 314. The wing-walk area markings is one of the things that stays, along with the small general notes.
And of course....proportions....which is why the Orlik is not the easiest to translate...it's a bit 'challenged' in the length department.
Looking at the size of the tail and ventral stabilizer it looks like they had approach angle and/or yaw issues. They 'could' have just stretch the thing a bit more. As planes go it looks like a 'Pug' ...![]()
I myself is liking the Orlik version.![]()