• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

767-200 - released

S

Sedr37

Charter Member
Hat off to Captain Sim for this bird! Update 1.3 released for 767-300. Downloaded it and purchased newly released 767-200. Now I'm 767 addict :)

767200xlscreens07.jpg
 
and too heavy on my frame rates - stutters on mine - yet the Herc gets beyond 30fps
 
I've only had the review copy for about an hour, but yes, it is a lot more heavy on frame rates than the Hercules, simply because it has about 30 times more systems than the Hercules! ;)

Although the Herc is very nice and a good representation of the aircraft, a 1960s "steam driven" turboprop panel isn't quite in the same league as a 1980s semi-glass jet airliner panel. The latter has a lot more to do and a lot more to calculate than the former.

I haven't tested the 76 against any other packages in an identical scenario yet, so can't say whether it is better or worse than anything else for frame rate hit, but at the moment, it looks about the same as the B757 - which considering it's doing more (weather radar) isn't too bad.
 
Well that still does not help my slide show - what ever the reason!!
 
But if you use an unfair comparison, then you'll get unequal results. That's all I'm saying.

I'm currently getting 9FPS because my settings are vastly too high for flying a complex airliner over a built-up area. I'll turn some down to far more appropriate settings shortly and the frame rate will be back up above 30, exactly as happens with every other complex airliner I have. Which is why I keep saved settings for "maxed out" (which is currently loaded because I was playing with scenery design), "complex GA" and "complex airliner".
 
well next week i will be on a real one
maybe ill have to get a sim version
just for memory sake
not my kind of plane though
H
 
IanP said:
But if you use an unfair comparison, then you'll get unequal results. That's all I'm saying.

I'm currently getting 9FPS because my settings are vastly too high for flying a complex airliner over a built-up area. I'll turn some down to far more appropriate settings shortly and the frame rate will be back up above 30, exactly as happens with every other complex airliner I have. Which is why I keep saved settings for "maxed out" (which is currently loaded because I was playing with scenery design), "complex GA" and "complex airliner".
Click to expand...

Well i actually do agree with you - and I love the product ( hard not to like Capt Sim aircraft) but have put it in storage until i get a new PC. :ernae:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top