• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

A Question...

J

jp

Charter Member
Does anyone know if anyone is developing a F-105? I seem to remeber that RAZBAM was working on one. Does anyone know the status there? A RAZBAM Thud would be awesome.
 
Yes indeed, we are working in one, the reason of the delay is that we are going to duplicate most of the real systems, and that takes times, in the same wagon, we are also working in a completely new A-6, with a "working" DIANE
Best regards
Prowler
 
put it in the fridge dude!, LOL, no closer than xmass holidays this year..and maybe after that, but it will come and it will rock (now that´s a statement i RARELY do, but i´ve seen what´s cooking, it´s great, sorry for the lack of modesty)..
We are swamped with the A-7 results, i mean, i can´t believe the amount of complaints about it being "too difficult" to fly, and that most users have it in their virtual hangars just because of this.Now if you feel the A-7 was difficult, try the Thud..or even worse, the A-6, the Buckeye is really an easy plane to fly (it´s a trainer after all) but you fail to monitor some stuff and it will bit you.We are staying with as close as FSX allows us to do regarding complexity and flight envelopes (engines etc), you´ll see more of this in the Harrier (definitely NOT a toy) and i´ll bet some of you will have nightmares with the A-26K electrical system, but well, those who did it in real life (and keep doing) made/make a hell of a good work withthem.
Sorry to hijack the thread
Best regards
Prowler
 
Prowler1111 said:
Yes indeed, we are working in one, the reason of the delay is that we are going to duplicate most of the real systems, and that takes times, in the same wagon, we are also working in a completely new A-6, with a "working" DIANE
Best regards
Prowler
Click to expand...


Does that mean we have to kick it sometimes to get it to work? Going to have to map a 'kick' key. :icon_lol:
 
Prowler1111 said:
put it in the fridge dude!, LOL, no closer than xmass holidays this year..and maybe after that, but it will come and it will rock (now that´s a statement i RARELY do, but i´ve seen what´s cooking, it´s great, sorry for the lack of modesty)..


We are swamped with the A-7 results, i mean, i can´t believe the amount of complaints about it being "too difficult" to fly, and that most users have it in their virtual hangars just because of this.
Prowler
Click to expand...


1. Something to look forward to, I love the Thud!

2. I think it flys great, it's one of my regular flyers!
 
[SUB]Awesome news Prowler! Glad to hear you guys are working on one. I'll buy it for sure :). I also have the A-7. I love it. If the Thud is anywhere near that it'll be awesome.[/SUB]
 
Prowler1111 said:
put it in the fridge dude!, LOL, no closer than xmass holidays this year..and maybe after that, but it will come and it will rock (now that´s a statement i RARELY do, but i´ve seen what´s cooking, it´s great, sorry for the lack of modesty)..
We are swamped with the A-7 results, i mean, i can´t believe the amount of complaints about it being "too difficult" to fly, and that most users have it in their virtual hangars just because of this.Now if you feel the A-7 was difficult, try the Thud..or even worse, the A-6, the Buckeye is really an easy plane to fly (it´s a trainer after all) but you fail to monitor some stuff and it will bit you.We are staying with as close as FSX allows us to do regarding complexity and flight envelopes (engines etc), you´ll see more of this in the Harrier (definitely NOT a toy) and i´ll bet some of you will have nightmares with the A-26K electrical system, but well, those who did it in real life (and keep doing) made/make a hell of a good work withthem.
Sorry to hijack the thread
Best regards
Prowler
Click to expand...


Sorry, I won't put it in the fridge, there's too much to get.
I also panthered the A7 in the beginning, but it was my own fault and a matter of **** and understanding. So no complaints here, the A7 is one of the best. I'd love to see the F-105 being modeled close to the original! Also the A-26, and the SB2C --> ??????????? ).

Cheers,
Mark
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top