• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Aerosoft Bell 205 Huey

Michael, it has to be said you are looking decidedly unwell at the moment, perhaps if you wore your baseball cap again it may help?
 
Got the same from Mr. Kok when I said I enjoyed the Hughes racer's eye candy but not the engine management. I'll never post there again.
 
Yep, I asked him how he thought his would be different from the other two, and he told me modeling. I said that I thought the Milviz/ND one was very well modeled and he said he lost me as a customer. Sounds to me as if he is very full of himself.
 
Rezabrya said:
Yep, I asked him how he thought his would be different from the other two, and he told me modeling. I said that I thought the Milviz/ND one was very well modeled and he said he lost me as a customer. Sounds to me as if he is very full of himself.
Click to expand...

Strangely they posted a patch for the Hughes a little later that made the engine management a little more forgiving :)
 
lol. Nice Roger. I was more than offended by his post because I have bought 6 planes from Aerosoft and he goes and says that!
 
Cool.. good to see Hueys making a comeback.. I am working on a Vietnam mission set.. My hueys are not aerosoft quality but will have plenty of cigarette smoking special forces and plenty of napalm (na-palm pics not available yet) and plenty of palm tree scenery-- FSX Apocalypse now -coming soon
 
Well... I would very much like to see the VC. It's hard to make a judgment based only on the exterior....

And given that some of the Aerosoft team have said some not so nice things about our model, I will be paying super close attention to this....

kc
 
krazycolin said:
Well... I would very much like to see the VC. It's hard to make a judgment based only on the exterior....

And given that some of the Aerosoft team have said some not so nice things about our model, I will be paying super close attention to this....

kc
Click to expand...

Assuming they've said bad things about your "final product," maybe you should wait a little bit longer.
 
I will.... hence the reason I made no comments about it one way or the other....

And there was no assumption made. It was quite clearly stated that their model was better.... (how they can make that judgment is beyond me...given that theirs isn't even done yet...)
 
The comments made by Mathijs were less than diplomatic, but it seems to me that some people here are calling the kettle black.

Can I ask if I should continue posting previews of this Helicopter here in future, like I always try to do? I'd rather not be in the middle of yet another political battle.
 
Nick C said:
Can I ask if I should continue posting previews of this Helicopter here in future, like I always try to do? I'd rather not be in the middle of yet another political battle.
Click to expand...


Please do continue posting them, they're great. Maybe devs could continue their "discussion" on their own forums, just a suggestion of course :173go1:
 
Well I understand the need for freedom of speech Pekka, that's what the forum are about. But I really don't want to get involved with the scraps that are becoming far to common.
 
Nick C said:
Well I understand the need for freedom of speech Pekka, that's what the forum are about. But I really don't want to get involved with the scraps that are becoming far to common.
Click to expand...

Yeah but I haven't seen Mathijs badmouthing competitor's product here in SOH.... but I could have missed it:mixedsmi:

But just in case this goes south... in before the lock:icon_lol::icon_lol::icon_lol::running:
 
That's just the discussion that's been had here on PM.

Anyhoo, I don't have the Nemeth model, I'm sure it's very good as the Dodosim one will be too.

Live long and prosper all. :icon29:
 
Nick, regardless of peoples thoughts on the product, you are doing a very fine job of advertising the product and there is no doubt because of it there will be increased sales. No product is ever perfect for everyone, I can find something I don't like about EVERY addon I have.

As for being in the middle, you have first hand knowledge of a product that has other versions out from other developers, it's natural. Just ignore those that are not involved with your project at that time.[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica]

Regardless of any nitpicks, this will be a definite purchase for me[/FONT]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top