Speaking only for me, I kind of prefer "crap" screens with lots of jaggies and horrible graphics. That's how it'd look on my PC, so by my standards it looks just fine. They are not pretty, but they are the only sim world I know. I don't much care how it looks on a PC with a million gigs of RAM and the latest Nvidia something-or-other, on my PC it'll look crappy, so if it can look good by crappy PC standards, it's fine by me.I am not nearly as impressed; those screens look worse than the ones they showed 2 years ago?!? I don't get it.
Be interested to hear if the FSX model has any benefits over the FS9 flavour - I would guess not, given it's essentially the same thing tweaked.
Oh and PS: I'm using the GMAX Academy C-17 2D panel until the avionics are fixed.
Works well...
Oh and PS: I'm using the GMAX Academy C-17 2D panel until the avionics are fixed.
Early days but it doesn't seem to have any outstandingly bad habits - I can land it without looking like a kangaroo!Anyone care to comment on the flight model? Many Alphasim releases tend to have FDE's that are....'quirky'?