There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
As morbid as it sounds, I am curious how the operation would have played out in practice.
From the books I've read on it, think Okinawa, but much, much worse for both sides. The Japanese were much better prepared for it than the allies thought they were. It's estimated over 12,000 aircraft of all types with at least half as kamikazes. They pretty much knew where we would land (not many options for amphibious landings in Japan) and with the first part, Operation Majestic, on the southern island in Nov 1945, , they were apparently intending to throw almost everything they had at us with very little reserves. The Japanese knew they couldn't win, but were intending to make it so bloody, we'd go for a negotiated peace agreement rather than the unconditional surrender we'd been demanding. It could have went either way. They weren't as defeated as revisionist history makes out.
From the books I've read on it, think Okinawa, but much, much worse for both sides. The Japanese were much better prepared for it than the allies thought they were. It's estimated over 12,000 aircraft of all types with at least half as kamikazes. They pretty much knew where we would land (not many options for amphibious landings in Japan) and with the first part, Operation Majestic, on the southern island in Nov 1945, , they were apparently intending to throw almost everything they had at us with very little reserves. The Japanese knew they couldn't win, but were intending to make it so bloody, we'd go for a negotiated peace agreement rather than the unconditional surrender we'd been demanding. It could have went either way. They weren't as defeated as revisionist history makes out.
Just uploaded Fast Ass Bird. Now on to the next one.
Any book recommendations?
I've got a couple around here somewheres. "Hell to Pay" by D. M. Giangreco is a good start. "Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire" by Richard B. Frank is also a good read on the subject.
'Nemesis' by Max Hastings, covering 1944-45. His accounts of the Japanese government's internal wranglings and their attempts to end the war ( rather than surrender ) are detailed, but readable and easy to follow.
'The Pacific War 1931-1945' by Saburo Ienaga. This isn't an account of such subjects as China, Pearl Harbour, Midway, Burma, Okinawa etc, but rather a social history of Japan during that period. It details what life was like in Japan, the press censorship, loss of civil liberties and so forth. Contrary to the received wisdom in the west, the Emperor was not revered as a god by many Japanese.
'Lighter Than A Feather' by David Westheimer. This is a work of fiction, a 'what-if' history, that tells the story of the Allied invasion of Japan, and it's consequences for both sides. I read it many years ago, and remember enjoying it.
'Kamikaze Diaries' and 'Kamikaze, Cherry Blossoms and Nationalisms' both by Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney. They explain much of what is unfathomable about Japan's national psyche in the 1930s and early 1940s.
'Fading Victory' The war diary of Admiral Matome Ugaki. He was in the other Betty that was shot down when Yamamoto was ambushed by P-38s. He survived and his diary is unique in that it provides a day to day account of Japanese naval strategy at the highest level. I believe it's out of print, but you might be able to order it second hand. I'm hanging on to my copy !
Amazon is probably your best bet on out of print books. I've got a few there. Mostly used in good shape.
Bjoern said:A dissenting population actually would have made an invasion easier than anticipated. Not as easy as rolling through west Germany, but at least less instances of militias and civil unrest.
One of the things the Japanese were doing was to conscript every man 15 to 60 and ever woman 18 to 40 to fight with whatever they had. I remember reading one woman was given an awl to use as a weapon and told all she had to do was kill one American.
I'm sure the people being pressed into Japan's own Volksturm did their best to appear eager to resist the invader and die for the Emperor, because any sign of dissent would have had them dragged away. As is always the case, it is easier to go with the crowd, than stand out and say no. Once the recruiters had moved on to the next town, however, those same war-weary civilians probably laid their improvised weapons aside and got back to discussing how they would surrender when the Americans arrived. That's the way of the world.