Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
So what is it about this hobby that when one announces a new DC3 or something like that, it gets jumped on as being wasteful repetition?
You're like a dog with a bone mate...I'm too old and ugly to rise...sorry.See my previous reply.

Bjoern said:Well, there's still tons of aircraft out there never done properly for FSX...so why do the popular ones two- or threefold?
-SNIP-
FSX does come with a DC-3, but it has problems, shape errors, flight model issues, and the port engine's prop turns the wrong way. It simply falls short of the mark.
Could've sworn there was a Do-328 released a few months back....![]()
:dYou're like a dog with a bone mate...I'm too old and ugly to rise...sorry.![]()
Not to mention that from the VC, the right wing and engine does not exist nor
does much of anything behind the cockpit seats. A pretty sad case, IMO.
Paul
Very,very nice,Martyn:ernae:
Would a paradrop effect be possible in FSX? Any plans for an AC-47?![]()

Thank you, Ken, that's highly appreciated and you bet we'll be putting our best foot forward to make sure that our current FS9 version cannot even stand in the shade of our upcoming native FSX iteration.![]()
Cheers,
Jan
Not to mention that from the VC, the right wing and engine does not exist nor
does much of anything behind the cockpit seats. A pretty sad case, IMO.
Paul
