• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

B1-B Lancer

kilo delta said:
Great to see an fsx'd Bone. Wonder what Tigisfat will make of this one. :)
Click to expand...

Tig was very glad and thankful to have the FS9 Alphasim B-1 at all. It was very standard in terms of features, aesthetics and fun back when it was released. It did, however, leave me longing for better sounds and passable flight dynamics for years. Though I understand the original AS sold well, b-1s just haven't really been modelled for FS much.

As for what I will make of this one, we'll just have to wait and see what it offers. It's too hard to judge it based on the little information we have at this point. I'll have to make absolutely positive to use my MSFS vs RW 'filter'. As most of you know, I have extensive B-1 experience, and I can't let every missing fastener or feature blind me from enjoying a good release. Surely the great numbers of you with experience on one aircraft or another can identify with that. I'll have to attempt to objectively judge it based on it's price point and demographic. That is to say that I'll be a lot more scrutinizing on it's accuracy if it costs 90 dollars, for example. If this is a 30 dollar aircraft priced for quick sales, then I'd say it's a winner already.

It's clearly been extensively reworked, and that is very promising. It looks great so far.:applause:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top