• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Blackbird Sims Mitsubishi A6M5 Released

I have to say, the CFS2 stock Zero holds up pretty well for being out in the wild for 25 years. Especially with B24Guy’s changes.

The BlackBird Zero looks amazing. I will pick it up when MSFS24 goes on sale. I’d ask for a MSFS version of Blackbird’s zero to join their Corsair, but I know that is not an easy ask.
 
John, thank you for the reply and the explanation about the normal map and I think it's the green channel? I didn't realize the amount of work involved to modify that effect. I know this effect is built into the developers paintkit released with the model. I am looking forward to seeing more of your work here on SOH.

This is an interesting video.

 
When there is discussion about green and blue channels, that typically always has to do with the creation of complete map (comp) textures - the green channel controlling roughness and the blue channel controlling metalness. It is a lot of work, if you manually create all of the green and blue channels for the complete maps, as I do. I'm no stranger to creating complete map textures, as you'll find in all of my MSFS and MSFS 2024 repaints (including those that I made for my Zero repaint). I also have no problem creating KTX2 files for MSFS 2024, as all of my 2024 repaints feature. I have no problem converting most KTX2 files to BMPs or PNGs as well (which also requires a very specific adjustment to the levels, afterward), as I also did with some of the Blackbird Zero product textures in order to add a number of elements from those textures that are missing in the paintkit files. However, when it comes to the normal maps that have been saved in MSFS 2024 KTX2 format, converting them to BMPs or PNGs, in order to edit them, is where the issues lay - they just don't seem to hold up well. There is nothing in the paintkit for the normal maps, just for the albedo and complete map textures.
 
Last edited:
Hello John, thank you for the explanation and honestly, I know the video link I posted was elementry to you, and I only added it to the post for others reading this so they might get an insight to what this is all about, as to me, I know very little and I appreicate you taking the time to present your explantions, I do enjoy reading them. When you say there is nothing in the paintkit for normal maps, is that just the Zero, or it that true for every developer who offer paintkits?
 
Not having any files covering the normal maps is common for all developer paintkits - in-fact, I don't know of any that do. The Blackbird Zero paintkit actually provides more than I have seen in any other paintkit - most developers don't include layered complete maps/comp files in their paintkits, just the albedo texture files.
 
Thank you, Akatsuki!

I've started on the next airworthy/restored Zero today, that being the Flying Heritage & Combat Armor Museum's A6M3 N3852. I'm hoping to have the forward fuselage camouflage stripes added by the end of the day tomorrow, and then the rear fuselage and tail on Thursday/Friday. Since the real aircraft is an A6M3, it has substantially longer wings than the A6M5, so I had to do some creative changes to the camouflage on the outer halves of the wings so that it would appear, without cross-referencing, that it's correct, and with no changes to the scale of the camouflage. While my last repaint had stencils and painted features that were specific to Nakajima-built A6M2s, this one will have Mitsubishi-specific stencils and painted features.
 

Attachments

  • WIP_N3852.jpg
    WIP_N3852.jpg
    705.4 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
I was able to get the forward fuselage camouflage added today, seen here with just the basic vector-drawn stripes (soooo much vector drawing) - to ensure all of the stripes line-up across all of the individual panels, parts and texture sheets. Once done, then I'll work on turning it into an airbushed look and add some additional airbrush "floof" in spots.

When making the wing textures yesterday, I noticed that the style of the stripes on the left and right wings are really quite different, and that's somewhat the case with the fuselage as well. So, it was interesting to learn today that when the restored FHCAM Zero, which I'm depicting, was painted, that it was something that was actually done intentionally by the FHCAM and the paint company they hired. They did this by tasking two individuals to paint the stripes, one on each side of the aircraft, so that it would cause the same sort of result to take place as would have happened in the field, when these aircraft were originally painted at Rabaul. Going up the line of parked Zeros, there would have been at least a couple guys painting each Zero at a time, and they would of course each have their own style of applying the striping. One of the details I like is how on the real aircraft, the gas cap on the right wing is painted over by one of the thin green camouflage stripes, and that's the case with my repaint too. Fortunately, Blackbird Simulations put the gas cap in just the right spot where it really is in reality, so that when I added the camouflage striping, using overlaid photos of the real thing, everything worked out perfectly, no adjusting/compromising needed - the green stripe went right over the gas cap.
 

Attachments

  • WIP_N3852_2.jpg
    WIP_N3852_2.jpg
    652.2 KB · Views: 11
  • WIP_N3852_3.jpg
    WIP_N3852_3.jpg
    712.8 KB · Views: 12
Last edited:
Excited for the FHCAM livery! Man, I miss Paul Allen. When he owned FHCAM, they had regular fly days. How often do you get to see THIS formation? (Taken by me in 2017.)

1756490245367.png

A few pics of the Zero that @Bomber_12th is doing... Sorry for the frozen props on these, I know better! But alas, unlikely to be an opportunity for reshoots.

1756490346620.jpeg

Zero-takeoff.jpg

Pacific_Theater_Day_FHCAM_2017 086 copy.jpgCorsair-zero-2.jpg
 
That zero have a second occupant mod?
Yep. Here's a link to an article on the restoration that shows it with the rear canopy open.


There's a second zero at Paine Field. I saw it very early in its restoration, and a lot has been done. Also has a P&W engine, but this one's in the original cockpit configuration.


Edit: Oh, the new one has flown! Wish I'd known about this, I'd have driven up!

 
Last edited:
I do hope that the FHCAM returns to more flying, soon. They've been doing a lot of maintenance checks and engine runs since the collection was acquired by Steuart Walton, but so-far the only aircraft in the collection at Paine Field which has flown since the acquisition is the Mosquito, which was flown down to the Palm Springs Air Museum, in California, for an event that was held there earlier this year, and then flown back - other than the Mosquito, none of the collection has flown since 2019. That's not including the FHCAM's newly-restored P-38, which was completed a few months ago, debuted at Oshkosh, and now has been based with Steuart Walton's private warbird collection in Arkansas. There have been a lot of rumors that the collection will eventually be relocating to Bentonville, Arkansas, but the Museum won't confirm anything about a future move. One piece of news that came out just last month, is that the FHCAM's long-time head of aircraft maintenance, Jason Muszala, together with the FHCAM's owner, Steuart Walton, have co-founded a new warbird restoration company in Bentonville, Arkansas, called "The Roost", where the FHCAM's Stuka was recently relocated to be completed to fly. That's probably the biggest clue yet that everything is eventually going to be moving there.

With regard to the FHCAM's Zero's two-seat modification, it is an historically-accurate modification that the Japanese did to at least two A6M2s, which allowed for an observer to sit in the back. There is an original two-seat modified A6M2, m/n 31870, that is displayed in Japan at the Hirosawa City Aviation Museum, and they were able to copy the modifications from that original surviving example. The FHCAM's Zero was one of three A6M3 Model 22s that were built new in Russia between 1994-1997 for the Santa Monica Museum of Flight (the other two are flying today with the CAF SoCal Wing and Fagen Fighters), using original blue print drawings and original parts as templates. Only a few original parts were used in the re-manufactured airframes, those namely being the landing gear and trim tabs. The airframes, minus wiring, systems and engines, were then shipped back to the US for completion. Paul Allen purchased the unfinished Zero (c/n 3852) in 1998 and contracted with Steve Hinton's Fighter Rebuilders at Chino, CA, to have it completed. However, the decision was also made to make it unique by modifying it to have the two-seat configuration (there was a time that the Museum was going to provide rides in the back seat, but lawyers put an end to that idea). By 2008, the aircraft was considered essentially complete, at least enough to be placed on display when the Museum in Everett first opened, but it wasn't until a few years later when they pulled it back out of the museum that they were able to get it fully ready to fly and finally test flown in 2012 (Steve Hinton performed the test flights). Several years back, the famed air-to-air photographer, John Dibbs, was able to utilize the rear seat of the Zero in order to shoot a series of incredible air-to-air photos of the FHCAM fleet of warbirds. For that photoshoot, they removed the aft canopy from the Zero, so that Dibbsy had a completely unrestricted view for his camera, looking to the sides and aft.

I'm happy to report, with regard to my repaint of N3852, that I just have the final bits of the camouflage to add today - just the horizontals, elevators and spinner.

Attached is a close-up photo of the A6M2 m/n 31870 that is preserved in Japan (restored to static display), which still has the two-seat conversion as done to it during WWII. It was this surviving airframe that allowed for the copying of the conversion on the FHCAM's A6M3.
 

Attachments

  • a6m2_31870.png
    a6m2_31870.png
    996 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
I am currently staying in Japan for work for most of the year and took the opportunity to visit the Kawaguchiko Zero Fighters museum. Just one hangar right at the base of Fuji-san and only open during August each year. But two nicely restored Zero fighters are on display (Early and late model), plus one frame without the cover, a Betty fuselage, two Oscars and more interesting objects. In germany I am not aware of any japanese fighters on display, so this was a great chance to see them up close. Once I'm back to my FS PC at home, I will try this one for sure.
Also lovely work on those paints @John!

20250815_151023.jpg20250815_153247.jpg
 
I remember seeing the "Hayabusha" (sp?) at the Museum of flight at Boeing Field. I was amazed at how light weight it looked, like Cessna light weight. I guess some of those are remove and replace airframe restorations, for understandable reasons. I also read in an aircraft restoration book that some of the Japanese aircraft used an alloy that over time would crystalize. It was a continuing issue for them to create the necessary metallurgy during the war for aircraft production due to resource limitations.

Impressive aircraft for its day.
 
I am currently staying in Japan for work for most of the year and took the opportunity to visit the Kawaguchiko Zero Fighters museum. Just one hangar right at the base of Fuji-san and only open during August each year. But two nicely restored Zero fighters are on display (Early and late model), plus one frame without the cover, a Betty fuselage, two Oscars and more interesting objects. In germany I am not aware of any japanese fighters on display, so this was a great chance to see them up close. Once I'm back to my FS PC at home, I will try this one for sure.
Also lovely work on those paints @John!

Thank you for sharing those photos from the Kawaguchiko Museum. Mr. Harada's collection and restorations are fantastic. I've read several times over the years that his A6M2 and A6M5 restorations were done to very near airworthy standards, but that with the strict nature of the Japanese civil aviation authority, it was felt that it would be a near impossible task of going all the way to actually getting them cleared to fly in Japan, if it were ever decided to do so. The Betty is quite interesting, in that the rear fuselage is a restored original specimen, while the forward fuselage and nose were built new, by Mr. Harada, to original spec. Several years ago, I read that he would like to build a set of wings for it, but I haven't read anything in regard to that recently. The fuselage of the Nakajima C6N Saiun that Harada has been working on was just unveiled there for the first time last year. It's fitted with an original Nakajima Homare engine.

When the Flying Heritage & Combat Armor Museum was put up for sale a few years ago, before Steuart Walton stepped in and purchased the collection, a couple of project airframes were sold to other buyers. One of these was an un-restored A6M5 m/n 1303, which was sold to an entity whose only business dealings were with the Hangar10 warbird collection in Germany, and the MeierMotors warbird restoration company in Germany. So, although I haven't read/heard anything about it since, it is thought that perhaps one day it might come out of the shadows again, fully rebuilt and flying in Germany.
 
I remember seeing the "Hayabusha" (sp?) at the Museum of flight at Boeing Field. I was amazed at how light weight it looked, like Cessna light weight. I guess some of those are remove and replace airframe restorations, for understandable reasons.

The Ki-43 Hayabusa/Oscar at the Museum of Flight is one of four that were built new by Herb Tischler's Texas Aircraft Factory (the same company that also built the five new-build Me 262s). Of those four new-build Ki-43s, the one went to the Museum of Flight for static display, the second was completed to airworthy and it flies with the Erickson Aircraft Collection at Madras, Oregon, and the two others, never completed, were acquired by Jerry Yagen/Military Aviation Museum and have been in storage for many years. Fortunately, it sounds like the Military Aviation Museum might soon be contracting with the company, Legend Flyers, at Everett, to complete one or both of the Ki-43s to fly (the company just completed the restoration of the Museum's A6M3 Model 32 'Hamp'/Zero).

The Flying Heritage and Combat Armor Museum at Everett owns what I believe is the most original of the surviving Ki-43s, with it having been crated and sent to Australia in late 1945 and then put away in storage for many years. It was restored to flight in the 1990s when owned by Sir Tim Wallis in New Zealand (Alpine Fighter Group), and is fitted with an original Nakajima engine. At the Warbirds Over Wanaka airshow in 1996, it briefly got airborne during a high-speed taxi down the runway, but has otherwise never flown since WWII.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for sharing those photos from the Kawaguchiko Museum. Mr. Harada's collection and restorations are fantastic. I've read several times over the years that his A6M2 and A6M5 restorations were done to very near airworthy standards, but that with the strict nature of the Japanese civil aviation authority, it was felt that it would be a near impossible task of going all the way to actually getting them cleared to fly in Japan, if it were ever decided to do so. The Betty is quite interesting, in that the rear fuselage is a restored original specimen, while the forward fuselage and nose were built new, by Mr. Harada, to original spec. Several years ago, I read that he would like to build a set of wings for it, but I haven't read anything in regard to that recently. The fuselage of the Nakajima C6N Saiun that Harada has been working on was just unveiled there for the first time last year. It's fitted with an original Nakajima Homare engine.

When the Flying Heritage & Combat Armor Museum was put up for sale a few years ago, before Steuart Walton stepped in and purchased the collection, a couple of project airframes were sold to other buyers. One of these was an un-restored A6M5 m/n 1303, which was sold to an entity whose only business dealings were with the Hangar10 warbird collection in Germany, and the MeierMotors warbird restoration company in Germany. So, although I haven't read/heard anything about it since, it is thought that perhaps one day it might come out of the shadows again, fully rebuilt and flying in Germany.
I got a few more. If you're interested, I can share them of course.
Your knowledge about warbirds is astounding, I didn't expect anyone here to be able to provide a background about the aircraft in the museum. It was a very cool place to visit, glad I could experience that. The Zeros and also the oscars especially have a great presence, even just standing there in the crowded hangar. The bare metal Hayabusa is just oozing speed visually. It actually reminded me of the Hughes H-1 a lot.

Both the Hangar10 collection on Usedom as well as the MeierMotors works in southern Germany are known to me. I followed MeierMotors on Facebook and saw some interesting updates about their warbird workshop, but never saw the Zero. Would be very interesting to have a flying one in Germany / central Europe.
 
My recollection was that Herb's first effort were some Grumman F3F's? The Me 262's benefit from having available new technology engines which make them a much more practical aircraft. The new production of replicas is quite good. The preservation folks are sin horror at rich guys buying and often flying rare and irreplaceable historic aircraft. Even the trained military pilots of the era crashed them with some regularity.
 
Back
Top