• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Boeing 787 Released

well.... first 2 are nearly off the books....

2013-8-1_11-8-0-294_1_zps50e04873.jpg~original


just about to clear the paint shed, a Fictional RAF variant, which i've dubbed 'Vantage' (seeing as the A330MRTT is the 'Voyager'):
Vantage_zpsc8666140.jpg~original
 
You should call it the "Victoria" Matt; the name has an RAF pedigree and, as it would probably be an interminable hangar queen, a royal name seems apt!! ;-)
 
:icon_lol::icon_lol: i toyed with 'Victoria' , 'Vantage', 'Vista'... but a buddy of mine decided it for me :icon_lol:

... now to fire up a formation with Fire Trucks....

taken in FSX but here's the 'Vantage' in flight (Same texture resolution as FS9)...

2013-8-1_13-0-13-439_zps17b1a5ab.jpg~original
 
You know... I have the 787, sitting in a hangar still dressed in house colours. That RAF scheme would sure look good on her... and would get the juices flowing to light her up and give her a few "assignments"...:salute: Beautiful work, Matt! :guinness:

BB686:USA-flag:
 
thunder100 said:
HIJACK

is there any way to contact Hiroshi for an non Facebook user?

While the RR flys perfect(apart FDE-power) in FSX (with Default 787-800 Panel+ tewaks) the given GE FSX model will not work at all.

Of course you can always use RR and rename the engine textures,but he may not be Aware of that fact

Thanks

Roland
Click to expand...
Check the title line in the Aircraft.cfg file. In FSX is is limited to 127 characters. I think the initial release for the GenX model had to many characters.
 
I'm liking this model although it seems it has way too much power.

Some nice textures appearing as well.

I've cut the power back a bit in the aircraft cfg ......

[jet_engine]
thrust_scalar = 1.00 ( back from 1.24 )

But it probably needs some better tweaking to sort the over power issue.

Looking forward to your new paints Matt.

Pete.
 
Eh matt very nice RAF 787. Would you be up to a USCG paint 787 please. I want to show off the USAF and tick them off, could be worse I might call for a USMC 787 lol.
 
Matt,

Thanks for all of the hard work with these repaints! I bet it takes some time for each one, and they look great!

May I please put in a request for a USAF repaint? Something generic with your 'cargo' mod would work awesome. Of course, if you'd like to make it a COANG livery... that would be the ultimate!

Thanks again!

Alan View attachment 91424
 
Trans_23 said:
Check the title line in the Aircraft.cfg file. In FSX is is limited to 127 characters. I think the initial release for the GenX model had to many characters.
Click to expand...

thanks I'll give it a try:is a bit of problem though as the title triggers the texture apperance

Roland
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top