• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Boeing says I do not qualify to sell a Boeing FS plane!

Ok then... so if Boeing won't let Bill create and market a "flight sim model" of the "Preditor", I wonder if IRIS Simulations, AlphaSim, Commercial Level Simulations, Wilco Publications... etc, all have experienced the same feedback from other Real World Aircraft Manufacturers?

I have seen alot of "freeware" Boeing models, mostly from "Project Open Sky", however.

BB686:USA-flag:
 
Do all the guys that have payware Boeings pay royalties and purchase copyright contracts and do they all have company liability insurance? Just curious.



Bill
LHC


I doubt that very much, knowing that most 'companies' are one-man bands and often working on the side of other things.

I, for one, will not even bother to ask anymore.... (yes, i tried a few times myself).

I also have a very pronounced opinion on large corporations, having been in the top of a few of them, and not agreeing with their 'big wigs' and 'marketing guys'. :wavey:
 
I have been blessed Francois. I have been not only given special permission in some cases, but even sent drawings to make the planes from. They saw the really good potentials from the advertising of their products, and I in turn put in direct links to their company sites for customers to follow.

I had hoped this would have worked for Epic. Kodiak (Quest Aircraft) were able to use the addon for their own uses, which was great for them as well.

Lanceair was a different story, lol.. eeks.. (remembers the commercial; 'wooots in yer wallet!?' )
 
Ken,

The more I think on it, the more I am toying with doing a concept fighter of my own design... I sure miss doing my own work.


Bill
 
Biill,

I think Boeing is making a dumb decision.

If you ever want to work with Lockheed Martin, let me know. I'm not saying I'm a big cog in the company, but I am in the company! :engel016:

Ken

at least Lockheed didnt lose their cajones after the SST wars..
 
Though I totally disagree with Boeing's decision because I find it shortsighted, I must also disagree with some of the view expressed here.

The key issue is does Boeing have a right to refuse to let others profit in any way off their designs?

The answer must remain yes.

The issue of freeware has absolutely no relationship. This is about a for-profit business which is inspired by the work of another for-profit business to market a virtual copy. Now, if you created something, you have a right to say no. It matters not what you and I think. It matters what the company who created the product thinks.

In this nation, that's freedom.

Bill understands this as well as anyone because he relies upon that freedom to create as he desires. No one can stop him from original thought and original creations. The law also protects his creations from unauthorized use. Boeing is merely exercising the same right which Bill holds vital to his operation. Take that right away from him and it might change his entire willingness to work so hard and well as he does. Further, that right doesn't get abridged merely due to the size and profit of the company in question. It it did, then someone poorer or smaller than Bill could claim he owes them a favorable decision.

That's the way it works, folks. And frankly, there is no other honorable way it can work.

Ken
 
Ken,

The more I think on it, the more I am toying with doing a concept fighter of my own design... I sure miss doing my own work.


Bill

We miss you doing your own work too, Bill. I think I must have every one of your early prototype aircraft, and sci fi stuff. Still fly the heck out of some of them.
 
I must agree with Ken, but Bill, I'd ask you to go back and try talking to Boeing through their Publicity and advertising folks.

Often one side of an organization has a different view of the other. I would view any model as part of a Boeing advertising campaign. If you'e already been talking to them, then work it from another angle.

Your view of the world is often shaped by where you're sitting at the time.


Ken, I got my Instrument Rating last month......
 
Back
Top