Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Craig, in actuality, that particular Zero that you saw is considered 'the real deal', as it really is a Mitsubishi Zero design - not a T-6 converted. How much original Zero is in that Zero, is debated, but it is definitely not one of the "Tora,Tora,Tora" replicas, which were made from Texans.
The Planes of Fame museum is the only group that can claim to have a completely original, airworthy Zero, including not only the original engine, but original structure as well - which all other 'real Zero's' are vastly new-build from original drawings and parts. In total, including the POF example, there are four airworthy Zero's in the world, that can be considered 'actual Zero's', with a fifth nearly completed, at the Flying Heritage Museum.
Many people don't seem to focus on it, but the easiest way to identify a real Zero, from a replica, if you ever get confused, is to simply look at the landing gear - there is a whole world of difference. The Zero's landing gear is tall and slim, while the Texan's is short and stubby.
The A6M2 Zero at the Warbirds-over-Wanaka Airshow this year was based on a T-6 Texan. The announcer made some comment about it being the only flying Zero in the world....... Is this correct?
And to think..we have how many tubeliners, P- 51's 38's, 47's,40's a B-17, a B-24, several spitfires, corsairs, pipercubs and not one quality AM6 zero? Why this classic airplane has not been done yet is beyond me.
Yes I thought of this one, but until someone converts it over to a useful FSX model were still without one. Every pilot report I have ever read says this was great airplane to fly.Well, there is the A2A/Wings of Power A6M, which, although not a true 100% FSX bird, is still very nice.