Calling all Sub Hunters to The Sub-committee

YES...YES...DINO....S-3A

Former S-3A Tactical Coordinator here and I vote 'aye for the S-3A. How can I help?
 
It is just an idea, for the moment... and a feasibility study. But looks promising, so let's see. And no E-2 from my side...at least for the moment.
 
I'm sorry; I had to go get on a fresh pair of shorts. A Dino S-3. Be still my beating heart!
We can only hope.
On a divergent note, I got an Email from a lurker who DL'd the BETA. Seems he was not impressed with the subs to date-a 'pathetic model','don't quit your day job', and 'why are you inflicting this crap on us???' indeed. Considering for a moment what it cost him (nothing) and the number of FSX submarines that look sort of like their RW equivalents (4) that exsisted previously, and putting aside the steep as the Matterhorn learning curve and 5 months since I started bending polys, and that this is a leasure activity that could just have easily stayed on my HD for good- What is the point of an angry email like that?
Put it down to the 'Greater Internet A$$#o!e Effect'. So, just to jack that one and his ilk up a bit more; To our work alive. JULIETT with aft tubes elevated BETA.

View attachment 80679
View attachment 80680
and for the BETA config file:


[formation.49]
title=SOVIET_JULLIET_class_SSG_elevated_tubes
unit.0=SOVIET_JULLIET_class_SSG_elevated_tubes,0, 0

Cheers all, and goodnight!
 
Back
Top