Carenado Seneca released

Well it is no Piper Aztec *COuGH please make one like I asked you to real nice.. Cough** but I guess I can practice in it still....
 
Looks like Carenados first twin prop is a go!
2009-6-29_3-30-10-430.jpg
 
Yes you are right its good :) + the paint will be good but i miss the mirror tex for the work that will have to be done here is my NZ paint
Jdh3-1.jpg

Waka172rg:engel016:
 
i sent a email to carenado asking for some fixes and the said to me

"We are preparing a patch.
Please check our site in 24 hours.
Go to our page and get it."

This was 16hrs ago not out yet so keep and eye out:blind::ernae:
 
waka172rg said:
i sent a email to carenado asking for some fixes and the said to me

"We are preparing a patch.
Please check our site in 24 hours.
Go to our page and get it."

This was 16hrs ago not out yet so keep and eye out:blind::ernae:
Click to expand...

The patch is now available at Carenado's website. :icon_lol:
 
I know this post won't be popular but I can't POSSIBLY be the only person wondering-

Carenado said:
The patch corrects these issues:

- Wrong lights switches position.
- Wrong magnetos switches position.
- Back navigation light not turning on with Nav light switch.
- Replaces the beacon effect.
- Modifies flight dynamics: elevator effectiveness and pitch Stability.
- Wrong Tooltips.
- Beacon lights not turning with the anti collision switch.
- CHT not working.
- Documents.
Click to expand...

Did anyone beta test this? A list like that is ridiculous... 5 seconds of beta testing would find most of those problems. (ANYONE with ANY testing experience can attest to that too...)

I'm glad they fixed them quickly, but they shouldn't have happened to begin with. I still don't know if I am going to buy this plane. Seeing a list like that makes it more doubtful by the minute.
 
After reading threads here sometimes I hold off until it gets narrowed down to final, so not to worry about checking to see if changes have been made. I'm also doing the same for the Tomcat to keep down on having updating it but done the less want to get them. They will be ready soon so I will hold off a bit longer and keep checking the thread.
 
Yeah it all depends how much you want to fly this A/C. I say i world have been my fastest snap up ever :icon_lol: :wiggle:
 
Kiwikat said:
Did anyone beta test this? A list like that is ridiculous... 5 seconds of beta testing would find most of those problems. (ANYONE with ANY testing experience can attest to that too...)

I'm glad they fixed them quickly, but they shouldn't have happened to begin with. I still don't know if I am going to buy this plane. Seeing a list like that makes it more doubtful by the minute.
Click to expand...


I agree - Im definately a Carenado fan and love this aircraft but as you say - they should get a beta test team - or listen to them at least.

Edit - just got back into the cockpit and they are forgiven!! LOL Just love the sound package on this.
 
As having lots of experience in Beta-testing their is usually annother rason for this

ITS NOT THEY DIDNT FIND

Usually it is compiling not the latest version of data together

Believe me after 8 different Connies

Still could be better,still they repaired immediately

Roland

Constellation/Starliner team
 
I congratulate Carenado for their VC lighting :applause:

You can switch off either the inst lights or the cabin glow.
 
Kiwikat said:
I know this post won't be popular but I can't POSSIBLY be the only person wondering-



Did anyone beta test this? A list like that is ridiculous... 5 seconds of beta testing would find most of those problems. (ANYONE with ANY testing experience can attest to that too...)

I'm glad they fixed them quickly, but they shouldn't have happened to begin with. I still don't know if I am going to buy this plane. Seeing a list like that makes it more doubtful by the minute.
Click to expand...

Pardon me while this gets my dander up to an all time HIGH! Let me get this straight they didn't dot their "i's" and cross all their "t's", but they got a patch out within the same week of release, and for that they deserve to be chastised? The Aerosoft Catalina had a least as many issues before thier update and it was A- when it came out before the update. You're kidding, right? We don't know what the reason is behind this. We also saw customer service on a level that would even put McDonalds to shame. The product was a B+ at release and now it ranks at least A- and that is because it isn't Accusim, but then it doesn't have to be to be a great product. This Seneca deserves 4.5 stars outta 5. It's that good.

If anyone is sitting on fence wondering if this is worthy purchase for less than $25.00 it is a MUST HAVE if you like twins.
Ted
Ted
 
I really like this plane.
Sounds great, fly's great :applause:

But is it normal when it take off's, it's get's of the ground quite hard and when the nose wheel is off then it starts climbing very fast?
 
I don't think it is as accurate as it could be. I an fix that on my own. I like the flight model of the Duke, the Piper Cheyenne, and the Piper Commanche much better, but they didn't cost $21.95 either. This is a great start toward Carenado's twin engine aircraft though.
Ted
 
Pardon me but where did you find the Sceneca for 21.95 (or "less than $25" for that matter) ??? All I can see is 29.95
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top