+1
Add vatsim to it and it's about as realistic as you are going to get without flying the real plane or a multi million dollar level d simulator.
-
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
CS B767-300 Is Available.
- Thread starter FAC257
- Start date
- Status
+1
Add vatsim to it and it's about as realistic as you are going to get without flying the real plane or a multi million dollar level d simulator.
ryanbatc
Charter Member
lolz.....ditto!
Oh and one more thing, if you buy the plane now do you get the AWACS version when/if they release it down the road?
Yeah, you probably are the type that will spend $100 to wear a captains hat and wings, and have a home built cockpit with the headphones and mike and 24 screens and 6 computers to make it feel real. I'm sorry, but I don't have that kind of money to throw away.
And, don't call me lazy when you don't even frakin know me, A-hole!!
FSX can be whatever you want it to be. Some people like to use state of the art Tubeliners with Vatsim and make it as real as possible. For some people, FSX is a GAME that they just like to fly arounbd in a fast jet. Others, myself included, use FSX to fly a plane that I would never have the chance to fly in real life. I use it as A simulator to fly planes like the P-47, F-16, B-17, F-22...anything like that. Fsx is not any one thing, it just depends on who is "playing" or "using" this simulator. This argument is completely invalid for this reason. If you don't like this plane then don't post in the thread. What you see as a useless hunk of polys may be an amazing plane to another. Think before you type!
S
StickMan
Guest
Yeah, you probably are the type that will spend $100 to wear a captains hat and wings, and have a home built cockpit with the headphones and mike and 24 screens and 6 computers to make it feel real. I'm sorry, but I don't have that kind of money to throw away.
And, don't call me lazy when you don't even frakin know me, A-hole!!
Oh sorry maybe your not lazy, maybe your just illiterate. And no Captains hat... YET! What do you wear on your shoulders? Your a$$? And when I mean Simulation I mean using the systems of the real aircraft as much as possible not sitting in a computer chair with a hat on. Sorry your first post here got heat, but instead of voicing your super negative opinion like a child you should try and give better criticism, plus since that was your first post, that means you signed up just to leave you negative two cents, so theirs mine or is that 4 cents now?
Well, I was signed up before you anyway
Sorry, it was only my opinion like everybody else's. Why don't you grow up and start acting your age and not your IQ. Learn to spell and speak English, DF
If you don't like my opinion then, F*ck You!!
S
StickMan
Guest
Well, I was signed up before you anyway
Sorry, it was only my opinion like everybody else's. Why don't you grow up and start acting your age and not your IQ. Learn to spell and speak English, DF
If you don't like my opinion then, F*ck You!!
Awww, all I was saying is there is better ways to criticize a add-on AND the people who are interested in it. Some here like aviation enough to read manuals and seek fuller realism in there simulation. You even said in first post your not even into simming that much, so why are you here? And more so you waiting over a year to make your first post and be a dick about it. You knock a product you do not like is fine, but in first post you tell EVERYONE if they wanted to but this add-on they should buy the real deal. Witch on your first post was your first dumb comment. No one here can afford a tube-liner OR a pro simulator. And last you end every post with a word that need to be censored.
And everyone dose have opintons, just most know how to voice theres.
And congrads on signing up before me, did not know there was a pirze for that.
- Status