Ctrl-Ezy FMA IA-58 Pucara released for P3D V4.5 and 5.0

Absolutely and a good suggestion. If you have a keyset or slider programmed for condition levers, that would be the way to go. :engel016:
 
Good day,

Just wondering - since the Tomcat will receive a more complete cockpit for VR as indicated in that thread, will the Pucara be revisited to provide a more complete (modeled, not asking for systems) cockpit? I think it would be welcome by many that are used to being able to pan around in a VC view.
This thread indicates that it was ruled out previously, but it seems like a mindset changed during Tomcat production.

Thank you.
 
SeanTK said:
Good day,

Just wondering - since the Tomcat will receive a more complete cockpit for VR as indicated in that thread, will the Pucara be revisited to provide a more complete (modeled, not asking for systems) cockpit? I think it would be welcome by many that are used to being able to pan around in a VC view.
This thread indicates that it was ruled out previously, but it seems like a mindset changed during Tomcat production.

Thank you.
Click to expand...

The tomcat will possibly be receiving a cutdown tub... not a more complete cockpit. It is also not being developed for FSX so can have more detail thrown at it than the pucara was able to have.

As we have said it is an evolving product range. We put out something see what works in the community , what doesnt etc. In this case the Pucara will not be retro-fitted with a tub.

The CTRL-ezy packages should never be considered for VR users as CTRL-Ezy is not built to be panned around in.

Hope this helps.
 
DaleRFU said:
The concept is great, I like to be able to just jump in and fly without having to read the manual for days. But the half cockpit is a deal breaker for me, as mentioned before behind the pilot doesn't have to be super detailed but to not even model it seems strange. I fly in both VR and normally and it'd bother me either way. For me the cockpit needs to be 360.
Click to expand...

I don´t fly VR ever but entirely agree with DaleRFU about the idea of half a cockpit being a deal breaker. Indeed it is for me regardless of price. Would buy it with a 360º, no doubt, plane looks great...
Regards
 
Quite. It is often forgotten these days just how forgiving P3D has become with regard to model size and complexity.We got quite a way with FSX but not really enough to make a difference. There will be subjects where we can model less complexity and therefore accommodate non-PBR materials and output for FSX. But the time is coming where common sense is going to have to prevail.:engel016:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top