• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Curtiss H75A GC II/5

Indeed.
I notice that the psd file is wonderful because the colors don't disruipt the background as rivets, sheet steel etc
For example, the others planes (Br693, MB152) have the colors who cover out.
I have not your competence.
My work looks like the painting not of the modelling.
 
OOOOO Yeah!!!

Of all our BoF aircraft, this one's me favorite!:applause:

..So, though both were outclassed by the 109s, which one stood up (stands up?) the best,
the H75 Hawk or the D520? Had I been a pilot back then I think I'd have felt safer and more
confident in the Curtis. :engel016:
 
Of all our BoF aircraft, this one's me favorite!:applause:

..So, though both were outclassed by the 109s, which one stood up (stands up?) the best,
the H75 Hawk or the D520? Had I been a pilot back then I think I'd have felt safer and more
confident in the Curtis. :engel016:
The problem of Curtiss is armament too poor : 4 machine-guns 7.5 mm! speed 487-500 km/h
D520 : 1 canon HS 20 mm and 4 machine-guns 7.5 mm speed 475-567 km/h
 
Back
Top