Roger
Senior Administrator
Does anyone have this and is the Beech 18 acceptible quality? http://www.justflight.com/product/discover-the-usa-first-class-simulations
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
The Beech 18 is almost nice... that is to say that the model has potential, but retains an unfinished air. The paints are splendid and the modernized VC panel is great. It has awesomely roarty radial sounds. However, there is no cabin and some of the animations are a little rough. I bought it for FS9 awhile ago and had to tweak the animations via aircraft.cfg to make things work... things like prop direction and failure of the tailwheel to retract. Overall, it's a fine attempt, but Miltons version has it outclassed. In FS9, it is also bested (by a smaller margin) by the Aerosoft version, but that doesn't exist for FSX.
The Beech 18 is almost nice... that is to say that the model has potential, but retains an unfinished air. The paints are splendid and the modernized VC panel is great. It has awesomely roarty radial sounds. However, there is no cabin and some of the animations are a little rough. I bought it for FS9 awhile ago and had to tweak the animations via aircraft.cfg to make things work... things like prop direction and failure of the tailwheel to retract. Overall, it's a fine attempt, but Miltons version has it outclassed. In FS9, it is also bested (by a smaller margin) by the Aerosoft version, but that doesn't exist for FSX.
Here are the changed contact points (in red) for tail wheel retraction.
[contact_points]
// forward side height, dmg, radius, Steer,SComp,ratio, damp, time time
point.0=1,-19.0000, 0.00, -0.15, 2000, 0, 0.35, 60.0, 0.20, 2.50, 0.900, 2.00, 2.00, 0, 0, 0
point.1=1, 3.0000, -7.00, -5.40, 2000, 1, 1.00, 0.0, 0.50, 1.50, 0.900, 9.75, 9.75, 2, 300, 300
point.2=1, 3.0000, 7.00, -5.40, 2000, 2, 1.00, 0.0, 0.50, 1.50, 0.900,10.25,10.25, 3, 300, 300
point.3=2, -1.5000,-23.80, 1.50, 1500, 0, 0.00, 0.0, 0.00, 0.00, 0.000, 0.00, 0.00, 5, 0, 0
point.4=2, -1.5000, 23.80, 1.50, 1500, 0, 0.00, 0.0, 0.00, 0.00, 0.000, 0.00, 0.00, 6, 0, 0
I use Shift/ L for the vc light but after no noticeable change I edited in the Shockwave vc light. Shadows are enabled in Dx10 by default.
![]()
![]()
Overall I am happy with the aircraft and will probably fly it fairly often.