srgalahad
Charter Member 2022
It's been an interesting read so far.
A couple of thoughts about general flying characteristics:
1. the race-ready comets were heavy (~2000 lbs of fuel) in a light (2900 lb) aircraft made it a handful.It's essential to roll in power slowly and judiciously until ( like most powerful taildraggers) sufficient airflow allows for positive rudder and elevator control. Being fairly short-coupled in pitch, it takes a bit (think trim) to get the tail up but then it's controllable with gentle inputs.
2. In most peoples' sim setups the lack of multiple (dual) throttles is a severe handicap. Many real twins are best handled on the ground and during takeoff with differential throttle.
3. In many cases, because sim pilots rarely explore slow-speed handling and stall entry there is a tendency to be too fast on approach and landing.. leading to unpleasant arrivals.
Here is a link to a set of pilot notes for the MSFS Comet: http://www.borzov.net/Pilot/FSWeb/LearningCenter/Aircraft/FlightNotesDeHavillandComet.htm
The two-position Ratier props were pneumatic:
"[FONT=Verdana, Arial][SIZE=-1]Two high compression de Havilland Gipsy Six R engines were installed, driving Ratier two-position propellers which were set to fine pitch before each flight. These went into coarse pitch automatically at 241km/h, when a sealing disc in the spinner opened to release the unit's internal pressure and thus activate the control mechanism.[/SIZE][/FONT]" Apparently the pneumatic cylinders were pressurized by means of a 'bicycle pump before takeoff. Seems one should be ready on the throttles as there was no guarantee that both would cycle at the same timedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9a5f/b9a5f359089101c442ca8a156887ead29a06cd36" alt="Icon Eek :icon_eek: :icon_eek:"
http://www.aviastar.org/air/england/havilland_dh-88.php
While not available to FS9 folks, someone made a module for x-plane to emulate the Ratiers.
http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=5656
To while away the flying hours, here is a lengthy articles/blogs about the Comet and other MacR entries---
http://airminded.org/2009/10/18/imperial-airways-now-with-extra-airmail/comment-page-1/ (scroll down to the Oct 20 soo9 entry to start. Be warned, it gets contentiousdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed7b2/ed7b2d5a4add60999df9bf3096d144ba14237dde" alt="Kilroy :kilroy: :kilroy:"
In addition, there is a long thread on CalClassic about controllable pitch props if anyone wants to know more about a project:
http://calclassic.proboards.com/thread/3770?page=1
A couple of thoughts about general flying characteristics:
1. the race-ready comets were heavy (~2000 lbs of fuel) in a light (2900 lb) aircraft made it a handful.It's essential to roll in power slowly and judiciously until ( like most powerful taildraggers) sufficient airflow allows for positive rudder and elevator control. Being fairly short-coupled in pitch, it takes a bit (think trim) to get the tail up but then it's controllable with gentle inputs.
2. In most peoples' sim setups the lack of multiple (dual) throttles is a severe handicap. Many real twins are best handled on the ground and during takeoff with differential throttle.
3. In many cases, because sim pilots rarely explore slow-speed handling and stall entry there is a tendency to be too fast on approach and landing.. leading to unpleasant arrivals.
Here is a link to a set of pilot notes for the MSFS Comet: http://www.borzov.net/Pilot/FSWeb/LearningCenter/Aircraft/FlightNotesDeHavillandComet.htm
The two-position Ratier props were pneumatic:
"[FONT=Verdana, Arial][SIZE=-1]Two high compression de Havilland Gipsy Six R engines were installed, driving Ratier two-position propellers which were set to fine pitch before each flight. These went into coarse pitch automatically at 241km/h, when a sealing disc in the spinner opened to release the unit's internal pressure and thus activate the control mechanism.[/SIZE][/FONT]" Apparently the pneumatic cylinders were pressurized by means of a 'bicycle pump before takeoff. Seems one should be ready on the throttles as there was no guarantee that both would cycle at the same time
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9a5f/b9a5f359089101c442ca8a156887ead29a06cd36" alt="Icon Eek :icon_eek: :icon_eek:"
http://www.aviastar.org/air/england/havilland_dh-88.php
While not available to FS9 folks, someone made a module for x-plane to emulate the Ratiers.
http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=5656
To while away the flying hours, here is a lengthy articles/blogs about the Comet and other MacR entries---
http://airminded.org/2009/10/18/imperial-airways-now-with-extra-airmail/comment-page-1/ (scroll down to the Oct 20 soo9 entry to start. Be warned, it gets contentious
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed7b2/ed7b2d5a4add60999df9bf3096d144ba14237dde" alt="Kilroy :kilroy: :kilroy:"
In addition, there is a long thread on CalClassic about controllable pitch props if anyone wants to know more about a project:
http://calclassic.proboards.com/thread/3770?page=1