• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

F-111 03

Looking good :cool:<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input jscode="leoInternalChangeDone()" onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I was hoping this model would include visable external structures as seen from the VC. There were a couple of spots in the video that show they aren't included. One spot where the pilot was looking aft and to the left, you could see wing vapor being generated where the wings should have been.
 
Bone said:
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I was hoping this model would include visable external structures as seen from the VC. There were a couple of spots in the video that show they aren't included. One spot where the pilot was looking aft and to the left, you could see wing vapor being generated where the wings should have been.
Click to expand...

Yeap, I noticed the same thing which is a glaring & bothersome omission for high end payware. I had posted the question about the wings/external structure views from the VC on their forums but no answer thus far. I'd be willing to bet the answer will be no on this one as well. That plus they still haven't addressed the constant flame in the burner cans/nozzles(that's an easy aftermarket fix). Will wait to see if the bigger issue of the external structures is addressed. If not I will probably do without an F-111 for FSX.
 
StormILM said:
VC on their forums but no answer thus far. I'd be willing to bet the answer will be no on this one as well.
Click to expand...
I have tried to access the F111-FSX forum without success , even contact admin with no reply . .... :wavey:over here or you can try at www.nzff.org :kilroy:

<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input jscode="leoInternalChangeDone()" onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
The sim in the video is ho humm and appears far from complete, but that soundtrack is killer. Great for killing zombies. :guinness:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top