Cirrus N210MS
Charter Member
flightsim is way off at flag staff az lol goto have to do alot of work to make it meet up with the new textures
-
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
fixing up Arizona Scenery
- Thread starter Cirrus N210MS
- Start date
Cirrus N210MS
Charter Member
i even can make working night textures!! which helps alot:salute:
Cirrus N210MS
Charter Member
ill have a preview video soon!
:salute:
:salute:
Cirrus N210MS
Charter Member
[YOUTUBE]75sSyjIEWs8[/YOUTUBE]
Not directed at you, Mike. Just a comment in general is all.
Photo scenery is nice as a rule. My only gripe is that the extent of what I've seen (cities, roads, buildings, etc) the photoreal loses my likings due to the lack of autogen. From a high altitude they look great though.
Photo scenery is nice as a rule. My only gripe is that the extent of what I've seen (cities, roads, buildings, etc) the photoreal loses my likings due to the lack of autogen. From a high altitude they look great though.
Meshman
Charter Member
I term photo scenery as "fly over" scenery. From takeoff to flight level, generally 1,000' and then from flight level to landing I'm not worried about the "flatness", as flying the plane takes priority over the visuals.
Autogen might be nice to have, but people don't appreciate the work involved, especially in a large scale project. I have a couple of payware addons for some islands sitting out in the Pacific, think Aloha! Autogen was added, but IMO doesn't really do much to enhance things. The developer could have spent the time removing clouds out of the imagery, rather than placing about 100 trees here and there.
Another consideration with autogen and photo work is that autogen takes rendering priority over textures. There's only so much that can be done in the rendering loop of FSX. If autogen is taking rendering cycles, that leaves less time for drawing in the sharpest texture level. I'd rather have sharp textures than a few oversized trees and buildings, that once at flight level do little to nothing for me.
Autogen might be nice to have, but people don't appreciate the work involved, especially in a large scale project. I have a couple of payware addons for some islands sitting out in the Pacific, think Aloha! Autogen was added, but IMO doesn't really do much to enhance things. The developer could have spent the time removing clouds out of the imagery, rather than placing about 100 trees here and there.
Another consideration with autogen and photo work is that autogen takes rendering priority over textures. There's only so much that can be done in the rendering loop of FSX. If autogen is taking rendering cycles, that leaves less time for drawing in the sharpest texture level. I'd rather have sharp textures than a few oversized trees and buildings, that once at flight level do little to nothing for me.