blanston12
SOH-CM-2025
Yes, but can you tell me why this would be better than the port over version?
There are port overs available?
I have tried the 1.2 'FSX' version on the SOH library but the actual model within it is a FS9 model.
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Yes, but can you tell me why this would be better than the port over version?
There are port overs available?
I have tried the 1.2 'FSX' version on the SOH library but the actual model within it is a FS9 model.
Uh, yes. That's what port overs are. In this case, the FS9 model is supported by FSX specific coding.
My question still stands: what do you hope the FSX native model will give you that the port over does not.
The reason I ask is even if converted to native, there is little I can do to improve on the package.
I have no one to upgrade textures with bump maps. And that is the only thing I see that could possibly add some value to the package.
Frame rates here are great on my 10 year old system. Just have not heard any complaints about frame rates in FSX with this.
The effort to convert to native will be massive due to the complexities, over 1000 lines of custom FS9 xml to be converted, hundreds of animations to be converted, etc. The benefits IMO do not warrant such a huge effort to convert.
Wow, it's rare to run across an airplane I've never heard at this point in my life. I feel better knowing there were only five ever built.
Some more info on it, including the sole survivor in sad condition:
https://ingeniumcanada.org/aviation/collection-research/artifact-fleet-50k-freighter.php
Looks like there's a shot of the RCAF camo version here:
http://aviadejavu.ru/Site/Crafts/Craft26477.htm
This looks really cool. Thanks, Milton!
Hi Milton, any chance of updates, different engine choices for 7d FS9'ers?
Still plenty of us around, pleeeze don't forget about us.