There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
agree with everything that has been said in this topic
here is my personal feel:
+ model is great as you can expect from Aeroplane heaven
+ nice variety of default paints
- Artificial look (textures to clean for a plane of its age and cockpit bit cartoonish but ok)
- not many third party repaints (which is ridiculous since it have a good paintkit)
all in all a very good flying aircraft! but in my opinion no winner
my ranking:
1) Warbirdsim
2) Flight1/AH
3) WOP Mustang
Best Regards
Tom
- not many third party repaints (which is ridiculous since it have a good paintkit)
If you think so, go ahead...
off topic, here's a nice video for you, Mud: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK5CTd0OVLw
I would copy that.
I have WOP and F1 P51. What i dislike most, is the fact that all the nuts and bolts in the pit of the F1 P51 are painted and not modelled. There is no 3D look on this. Flat double thumb down for this.
Wrong, wrong wrong. Every nut bolt and rivet in the F1 P51d is modeled in 3D. If you don't believe me, remove all the textures and load it up and see what you get.
sound and flying model look more authentic to me in comparision to the real "Double Trouble 2" which was flying in my neighborhood last year.
As i said, the model itself, does not deserve a price. Too simple and not enough detail.
You are kidding right? Look at the shots. The cockpit is finished that way because it is that way. Compare the shots.
I would take WOP if you are out for a nice looking plane and pit.
IF you want a sim to fly more realistic, take F1 one.
That is the choice for the customer to make which is good. But can we please have our facts straight?
Cheers
Martin
This whole VC texture issue has been addressed before. If you look at the aircraft the F1 P-51 was modeled after you'll see that the VC tuxures are spot on compared to the original aircraft. Which is also dull and lifeless.
I like it. That being said, I'm sick of P-51's. You'd think it's the only aircraft that fought the war the way it's over done. I just don't fly 51's anymore! JMO
Yea, I know there are a lot of folks who just love the P-51 and there are a lot of little known variants and everyone who knows anything about the P-51 wants a particular version done for FSX. . . .but. . .I also think enough is enough. . .great airplane, love the sound of the engine, looks cool flying by at max speed, but after that. . .ok what's next? lol. . . . .That being said, I'm sick of P-51's. You'd think it's the only aircraft that fought the war the way it's over done. I just don't fly 51's anymore! JMO
G'Day Ark,
Glass cockpits and FS9 are PITA but we are getting there mate. It's all got to work properly otherwise there's no point. Thanks for hanging in.
B.