• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

FSX Native F-4 released!

warchild said:
Hmmmmmmmmm..
Zohh,, You Vhant a J zzzeventy nine engine do you???
:::LOL:: let me get my new mobo in later today and talk with dave about it.. perhaps we can do something just for you guys :D.. no promises but i'll do my very best.. Sides, the f-4 in the pic i posted earlier is the Iris FG-1 naval version.. doesnt have the box on the tail, annnd i'd enjoy the challenge of making an f-4 that really could do a back flip
Click to expand...

If you want the RWR pod on the tail (fitted to Royal Navy F-4s post 1976) you need to use one of the models from the RAF FG.1 pack - making sure that the one you choose isn't one with the recce pod fitted, as the RN never used them. I'd use the "B"-fit, personally.

Dave
 
thanks dave.. truth told though, i'm just a number cruncher. dont know a thing about the model itself, only the fde, but i'll give the very best of my efforts..
 
Here's the AS F-4J after a bit of porting:

Screen-Wednesday-004.jpg
 
Welll, just to be fair to th gentleman above, these fs9 f-4s work quite well in fsx. Naturally glass textures need to have their alpha channels reversed and the default view in the panel.cfg file needs to be adjusted, but, they look and fly great.. Here's a couple examples of ported f-4s from my own version of fsx. again, this is windows 7, dx-10 is not being used. scenery settings are well, they arent low..
Firts up, the Iris FGR-2 navy version with my own paint representing one of the aircraft that was stationed at my base in vietnam..

2009-4-4_15-43-17-43.jpg


2009-4-4_15-45-9-933.jpg


2009-4-4_15-44-11-331.jpg



Next up, the cloud 9 Phantom in steve ritchies paint..
2009-4-4_15-56-53-705.jpg


2009-4-4_16-0-1-540.jpg


2009-4-4_16-1-8-316.jpg
 
GRWEAT Steve Ritchie repaint!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But the VC?
 
Kiwikat said:
Just curious why you would port when you have your scenery settings that low anyways? Why not just use it in FS9? :kilroy:
Click to expand...

Simple. I want your attention on the aircraft, not the scenery.

Dave
 
warchild said:
Hmmmmmmmmm..
Zohh,, You Vhant a J zzzeventy nine engine do you???
:::LOL:: let me get my new mobo in later today and talk with dave about it.. perhaps we can do something just for you guys :D.. no promises but i'll do my very best.. Sides, the f-4 in the pic i posted earlier is the Iris FG-1 naval version.. doesnt have the box on the tail, annnd i'd enjoy the challenge of making an f-4 that really could do a back flip
Click to expand...


Tell David that if he builds it, I'll review it :kiss:

lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top