• Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning old domain name stealing credentials

  • Special Server Maintenance

    Just when you think you have everything running some what better...

    You get a message from the Hosting company. Short story they need to move us to a new server. I have been working with them to plan a good date for all concerned. Here is what we have come up with as a schedule.

    1. November 4th 17:00 -5UTC shut off the forums and start backup proceedures. During this time there will be no access to the forums or the Resource Section.
    2. November 5th Continue with Backups and download same until complete.
    3. November 6th 7:00 turn over server to hosting company to move system to new server
    4. November 7th - 8th restore backups and upgrade forum software.

    If all goes well we should be back online on November 8th.

    To keep you updated we will post updates on AVSIM forums.

    Thank you for your support.

'Funny How This Design Was Laughed At'

It was laughed at becasue it was too slow, and too narrow for mansell to fit his beehind in..
 
It was laughed at becasue it was too slow, and too narrow for mansell to fit his beehind in..

Sorry, but I disagree - The airbox wing assembly was quickly removed after 1 maybe 2 races...(but it's ever so present now)

Was the car slow? "yes" but the point of the thread is the airbox wing assembly :)
 
Actually it was an attempt to gain more down force and failed miserably, although it was trotted out at the Hungaroring with even more idiotic wings tacked on late in the year.
Typically stupid MacDonalds 'design', the airbox wing rendered the rear assembly almost useless due to turbulence, today's 'Newey' fin acts as a boundary layer device working directly on the wing assembly.

As for its use by the other teams, another example of the 'Purple Pole Effect'.

Not one of the better devices to wear Marlboro colours, Ferry is pretty well on the mark, it was dog slow ALL year (with or without the stupid airbox), Mansell's bum was too big to fit in the original tub, and it nearly killed 'Mikka the Finn' at Adelaide.
The 1996 car was another 'Pre-Newey' dog, finally resolved with Newey coming on board for 1997 and designing the first of the 'West' cars ..................:d
 
So Wombat,
What's different in present times now that a few teams are using that basic airbox design :ques:
 
McLaren's contruction was designed so that an extra wing could be placed in an area not (yet) regulated by the FIA, Kinda like the 'X-wings' besides the cockpit or the Arrows with the wing on top of the monococque. McLarens' mid-wing returned in 1996 during some of the high downforce races btw.

The current airbox design should increase stability in a straight line and, as Wombat mentions, helps to creat a more laminar airflow towards the rear wing. Of course we now know that McLaren actually guides air through the fin to a slot in the rear wing that stalls the wing at high speed, reducing drag and increasing top speed; the so-called 'F-duct'.

BTW In terms of drivers' positions 1995 was the worst year for the team since 1980..
 
...Of course we now know that McLaren actually guides air through the fin to a slot in the rear wing that stalls the wing at high speed, reducing drag and increasing top speed; the so-called 'F-duct'..
The other teams draw air from the airbox, but McLaren apparently takes air from a blister ahead of the cockpit.
Amounts to the same thing at the wing, but does not alter the engine air intake volume as the others must.
The F1 designers are a clever lot, and incredibly ingenious...
 
If memory serves correct,
That rear wing duct wasnt there at the beginning of the season however....It was just the airbox extension...

The duct is only of the last race or 2....
 
P, here's a photo from the pre-season testing in Spain; note the intake on top of the monocoque..:

146005.jpg
 
Back
Top