• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

GPS approach/landing for airliners

The Visual Approach is never going to go away!

I think this article was talking out of turn. They're calling it GPS approaches, when in fact what they were talking about was GPS routing. We've all been doing GPS approaches for years, but the routing has been along the standard old Jetways and Victorways.

The funny thing is, we don't actually tune in ground stations to fly the tradional J/Vways. GPS is used to navigate these routes with what we call a "GPS Overlay". This is where we actually use the GPS to track along the Jet or Victor route without tuning into the VORTAC/VOR stations. We plug the phonetic identifier's for the whole route into the FMS and Wallah!, a GPS overlay is constructed. If the GPS becomes disabled for some reason, the FMS defaults to it's "auto-tune" function, and reads the phonetic identifiers and starts auto-tuning into ground stations. In the auto-tune mode, the FMS will tune in three VORTAC/VOR stations and up to six DME's in the surrounding area, and basicly turns into an RNAV system. It never relies on one ground station for fix to fix navigation.
 
Thanks for the insight.

The article is confusing, i agree... I thought he was writing about final approach (cutting corners).

Would a GPS + altitude radar driven FMS able today to deliver the aircraft to the threshold in an unconventional approach (eg 90 deg) without ILS, at least theorically ?
 
dominique said:
Thanks for the insight.

The article is confusing, i agree... I thought he was writing about final approach (cutting corners).

Would a GPS + altitude radar driven FMS able today to deliver the aircraft to the threshold in an unconventional approach (eg 90 deg) without ILS, at least theorically ?
Click to expand...

Yes. FMS/FMC's have vertical nav (VNAV) ability, although it's used mostly for enroute descents.
 
GPS is nice and makes navigation much easier, but what if something happens to those GPS satellites and the system is disabled? I certainly hope that VOR and ILS will be maintained as back up systems.
 
stansdds said:
GPS is nice and makes navigation much easier, but what if something happens to those GPS satellites and the system is disabled? I certainly hope that VOR and ILS will be maintained as back up systems.
Click to expand...

There's a strong builtin redundancy with 24 satellites providing triangulation. So failure looks improbable. Disabling is another issue as the US own the key so to speak...

I wonder if regional jets use INS ? Bone ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top