
oh why oh why are we so intent on protecting everyone from themselves and everything around them?? The flaw in making the world safe for the 'lowest common denominator' is that we then make that a standard by which to measure.
How many of us had relatives that tried (or DID) sign up to go to war while "underage" in the last 100 years (note: war is inherently a high-risk endeavour with a low rate of survival)?
How many probably had ancestors that ran off to sea or the circus at 14 - without current workplace safety rules- and did quite well in the process of growing up?
How many of us have had friends at 14, or 16, or 25 killed in cars (but they are part of our daily life and therefore 'normal').
Having done some offshore sailing in ugly conditions, I well know it can be very dangerous and incredibly scary and your attention level tends to stay very high - esp. if you have been well-schooled in the concepts and risk (and we have no clear picture of her training). The major concerns I see are her physical skills and strength ( but modern boats can be engineered and equipped to mitigate this) and her psychological strength to undertake a long solo voyage (but what about those of us who get all antsy when our fav. forum is unavailable for 2 days?).
The cost of a rescue?? What is spent rescuing mountain climbers, drunk drivers, lost tourists, skiers, dogs and kids from wells every year? I agree, there are cases where it should be 'cost-recovery' but where to draw the line? After 230 years there is still a desire (and cost) today to recover the crew of ships of exploration - even though they may have been lost due to poor seamanship or planning.
Part of our nature is this care for souls and to have happy endings ( or "closure") but there is also a value to be placed on building character, wisdom and skills that is not going to happen if we make rules for others that keep them contained in soft rooms with padded corners until they reach 'an appropriate age'.
Her maturity and ability to choose? We don't know, but I have known 14 yr olds that were wiser than I was at 18 or 20, and "adults" that shouldn't be allowed out alone at 35 but have families, jobs and a variety of unhealthy habits. Who are we to judge?
One thing I do know about her. With all the legal wrangling, media coverage and interviews she has had to endure, she is probably far more cognizant of the risks than most of the spectators who are so able to pass judgement. Yes, counsel her, advise her, but don't arbitrarily restrain her in a safety net she may not need.
Rob
View attachment 13831