• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Hms invencible r05

CIMOGT

Charter Member
This is the first test of the model, pending all light and the control panel gauge, maybe change some textures

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • invencible7.jpg
    invencible7.jpg
    50.6 KB · Views: 10
  • invencible8.jpg
    invencible8.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 10
  • invencible6.jpg
    invencible6.jpg
    45.5 KB · Views: 9
  • invencible2.jpg
    invencible2.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 10
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • invencible1.jpg
    invencible1.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 10
  • invencible5.jpg
    invencible5.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 1
  • invencible3.jpg
    invencible3.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 9
  • invnecible4.jpg
    invnecible4.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 9
Nice! Seen her in person many moons ago as she came to port in our city. Took these on my old 35mm that day. These photos are scanned from printed photos:
attachment.php
attachment.php
 
Very nice! Minor observation in the first shot the superstructure looks too tall, or maybe the hull is too far down in the water? Annoyingly I don't think I kept any deck plans from when I was on her.
 
Very nice! Minor observation in the first shot the superstructure looks too tall, or maybe the hull is too far down in the water? Annoyingly I don't think I kept any deck plans from when I was on her.

I use this for the line and size of her
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • R05-HMS-Invincible-038.jpg
    R05-HMS-Invincible-038.jpg
    74.9 KB · Views: 19
Very nice! Minor observation in the first shot the superstructure looks too tall, or maybe the hull is too far down in the water? Annoyingly I don't think I kept any deck plans from when I was on her.

Now then matey Skippy is indeed correct - the superstructure on and around the bridge, flyco and admirals bridge just looks a little bit too tall as if it's been stretched slightly...I think the proportions of bridge height against the funnels is correct but the funnels themselves look a bit too tall which is probably affecting your proportions.

I spent nearly a year modelling Invincible, illustrious (and then remodelling) Ark Royal so I know how hard it can be to get the dimensions right...so I commend your work!

:encouragement:

Gaz
 
Now then matey Skippy is indeed correct - the superstructure on and around the bridge, flyco and admirals bridge just looks a little bit too tall as if it's been stretched slightly...I think the proportions of bridge height against the funnels is correct but the funnels themselves look a bit too tall which is probably affecting your proportions.

I spent nearly a year modelling Invincible, illustrious (and then remodelling) Ark Royal so I know how hard it can be to get the dimensions right...so I commend your work!

:encouragement:

Gaz

thank you, it is difficult without accurate information, many photos from different times, but there are not many detailed diagrams of the changes and added to the little experience in modeling

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    52.6 KB · Views: 18
Now then matey Skippy is indeed correct - the superstructure on and around the bridge, flyco and admirals bridge just looks a little bit too tall as if it's been stretched slightly...I think the proportions of bridge height against the funnels is correct but the funnels themselves look a bit too tall which is probably affecting your proportions.

I spent nearly a year modelling Invincible, illustrious (and then remodelling) Ark Royal so I know how hard it can be to get the dimensions right...so I commend your work!

:encouragement:

Gaz

I correct the proportions , left is the new one

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    31.2 KB · Views: 18
Nice model😀 The illustrations from Shipbucket unfortunately vary a lot in quality and accuracy. If I have no other option than using a shipbucket drawing I usually make an overlay with a real photo taken at an angel as close as possible to 90 degress to check dimensions. It is not as good as a real GA plan but it does save you from some mayor setbacks when you realize that the illustration was wrongly dimensioned... eg the type 45 I am working on now the illustration was 10 % too wide. Henrik
 
Hi
I must correct you on the name of the ship.She is HMS Invincible.

Invincible means unbeatable.

The Falklands war HMS Invincible and HMS Hermes served with the fleet.

They were affectionately known by the troops that served in that action as the invisible and the herpes.

Cheers Chris
 
Hi
I must correct you on the name of the ship.She is HMS Invincible.

Invincible means unbeatable.

The Falklands war HMS Invincible and HMS Hermes served with the fleet.

They were affectionately known by the troops that served in that action as the invisible and the herpes.

Cheers Chris
The name is written in Spanish, since I'm doing it for a group that speaks it, and don't make the change
 
Back
Top