• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

HU: Revised Lockheed L1649A availablle

Hi,

thanks for the links. We've been through some obvious sources already, including our library. There's an excerpt about the T-34 engine from a C-133 manual on enginehistory.org as well whih helped answering a few questions.

We have comprehensicve data about the other Constellation types, what we lack of is information about the powerplant and instrumentation of the L-1249A in particular. Maybe information about other C-133-equipped aircraft would be helpful, particularly the C-133 which was apparently the only type that went into series production.

Best regards,
Volker
 
Hi Rally,

'four or five' is actually absolutely correct. 4 aircraft were completed as turboprops (2 USAF, 2 USN) and the fifth was the prototype 'Old 1961', which recieved a turboprop in #4 engine position - retaining a R-3350TC in #1 and two R-2800 in the inboard positions. So it depends whether it counts as a turboprop or not.

Found same when i was on fact finding in Manfreds-team when we made YC-121(which was actually the first of the Connie series-therfore no VC).And I could get in contact of one of the 1500th and one which flew with it transcontinental.

Feeling wise a L-1449 would have been a much better plane then a L-188

Stupid thought is that actually the 3 Prop/1 turbine could be made as Manfred has all that parts in GMAX

But rather for that I would ask for an FSX output of the Connie series

Roland
 
Hi Roland,

until Manfred has wrangled all the variations of the Diesel 3 out of Gmax into FSX I don't think there is much of a chance of him going back to the triple-tailed lady. And even after that I am not too optimistic.

He did share the files with us when ever we asked, but as I turns out beyond moving a few polys around to show what I am trying to get I am hopeless at even modifying an existing AC.
Volker did a splendid job I think on the L-049 but realistically is unlikely to have as much time to dedicate to the modeling as in the past.
As always time will tell.....

Cheers
Stefan
 
Back
Top