• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

I wish my hangar had a...

I wish my hangar had another (choose all that apply)...

  • 1930's - WWII aircraft

    Votes: 41 37.6%

  • Cold War aircraft

    Votes: 63 57.8%

  • GA Cessna/Piper

    Votes: 12 11.0%

  • 1950's - 80's Research aircraft

    Votes: 18 16.5%

  • Prototype or "What if" aircraft

    Votes: 16 14.7%
  • Total voters
    109
  • Poll closed .
Variety is the most important for me. Too much of one thing makes it boring. While I love the uber realistic GAs from A2A/RealAir, but I don't fly them ALL the time, likewise with the warbirds, vintage GA, tubes, military jets, gliders...etc Likewise flying different 'mission' types keeps FSX fresh...ie short A-B, long A-B, bush flying, aerobatics/airshow routines, sight seeing, flight training/skills refreshers.

We all have our 'wish lists' but in the end it doesn't matter, as long as the developers get to make what they are passionate about and want to make...not what they think we want them to make. This can be said for any artist, musician, chef, software developer...etc...anyone who creates things. Do they create what they excites them, taking chances to bring new things, occasionally producing a 'dud' or do they reproduce what they think will sell lots of copies. I find I typically enjoy things from 'creators' more than I do from 'reproducers', even if what is being created doesn't fit my tastes, I really respect the creative process.:santahat:

Cheers
TJ
 
attachment.php


A 'really good' Thud.....
I already have a 2D pit for it ....just need a top-class VC/model to 'match' ....;)
 
Fsafranek, I know you'll get one for sure on your list...the MU-2...it's being done by MilViz...they've posted teaser Screens on their Facebook page.
 
DennyA said:
1) F-15D with back-seat controls (since that's the one fighter I have actual stick time on!)
2) F-8E Crusader (native FSX)
3) XF8U-3 Super Crusader (I know that's super-niche, but it'd be amazing!)
4) F5D Skylancer (Same as above : )
Click to expand...

YEAH! cool planes. I saw both the -3 crusader and the skylancer fly at Moffitt field in the 50's. The skylancer was a real beauty.

don't holf your breath though...not a wide appeal.
 
pilottj said:
Variety is the most important for me. Too much of one thing makes it boring. While I love the uber realistic GAs from A2A/RealAir, but I don't fly them ALL the time, likewise with the warbirds, vintage GA, tubes, military jets, gliders...etc Likewise flying different 'mission' types keeps FSX fresh...ie short A-B, long A-B, bush flying, aerobatics/airshow routines, sight seeing, flight training/skills refreshers.

We all have our 'wish lists' but in the end it doesn't matter, as long as the developers get to make what they are passionate about and want to make...not what they think we want them to make. This can be said for any artist, musician, chef, software developer...etc...anyone who creates things. Do they create what they excites them, taking chances to bring new things, occasionally producing a 'dud' or do they reproduce what they think will sell lots of copies. I find I typically enjoy things from 'creators' more than I do from 'reproducers', even if what is being created doesn't fit my tastes, I really respect the creative process.:santahat:

Cheers
TJ
Click to expand...

Hear hear........ :untroubled:
 
Fsafranek, I know you'll get one for sure on your list...the MU-2...it's being done by MilViz...they've posted teaser Screens on their Facebook page.
Click to expand...

I just noticed the other day that Flysimware also has mention of a MU-2 on their homepage. Probably quite a ways off, but still presumably in the works.

http://flysimware.com/website/
 
I would love to see some of the old transports coming into a new being, like the c-46, c-123k, and the meanest looking of all (imho), the c-119.
 
FSX native:

1) Ultraflight Lazair ultralight (piston or electric version)
2) Tora! Tora! Tora! "Zero" (nee AT-6 Texan)
3) Zlin Savage Cruiser or Zlin Savage Bobber (prefer the Cruiser)
4) Aeronca 15AC Sedan
5) PZL 104M Wilga 2000 (with a horizontally opposed Lycoming flat six IO-540 engine)

N.
 
Something that hasn't been done a dozen or more times. Something like an HFB-320 Hansajet, or an Avro Canada C-102 Jetliner, or a YC-15.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top