Ralf Roggeveen
Charter Member
Took a look at Alexandria airport and found much Imperial activity there at the crack of dawn:
View attachment 44037
Volker is right that they usually left very early, taking advantage of daylight and cool air. All along these routes there were designated emergency landing places, mainly needed to avoid dust storms. In fact the next bit - probably the shortest leg - Alexandria to Cairo down the Nile Delta - was often done by train.
This seems a bit more stylish, however:
View attachment 44038
The three-engined Short S-8 Calcutta, named after the capital of the British Raj for most of their 200 or so years in India. This particular one, despite having its type name in huge letters, was most appropriately called City of Alexandria. We left at 05.30:
View attachment 44040
This was even more like driving a flying car, a convertible in fact, since the Captain and First Officer didn't have a roof. I maintained radio - sorry, wireless - contact all the way, sticking to an altitude of 3000 feet.
View attachment 44041
Being on the outside, with them just behind you, you don't need a little window to keep an eye on the engines:
View attachment 44042
The noise would have been something else, but they'd have been kept nice & cool (aircrew and motors):
View attachment 44043
Most of the way you can see the Nile (which is, of course, our destination airport) below:
View attachment 44044
The British relationship with Egypt was rather complicated. Technically it was supposed to be an 'Anglo-French Condominium', though the French never did much more than a bit of catering there, having bottled out of the original invasion in 1884. In theory Egypt was still part of the Ottoman Empire till WW1, but of course power lay with the British Governor-General, the Egyptian Khedive being a figurehead, like a British monarch. Just as today's superpower wants everybody in the world to be a democratic republic (it works for us, so it must be right), so the British set up constitutional monarchies everywhere. Who do you think decided that countries like Jordan and Saudi Arabia should be ruled by a 'king'?
View attachment 44037
Volker is right that they usually left very early, taking advantage of daylight and cool air. All along these routes there were designated emergency landing places, mainly needed to avoid dust storms. In fact the next bit - probably the shortest leg - Alexandria to Cairo down the Nile Delta - was often done by train.
This seems a bit more stylish, however:
View attachment 44038
The three-engined Short S-8 Calcutta, named after the capital of the British Raj for most of their 200 or so years in India. This particular one, despite having its type name in huge letters, was most appropriately called City of Alexandria. We left at 05.30:
View attachment 44040
This was even more like driving a flying car, a convertible in fact, since the Captain and First Officer didn't have a roof. I maintained radio - sorry, wireless - contact all the way, sticking to an altitude of 3000 feet.
View attachment 44041
Being on the outside, with them just behind you, you don't need a little window to keep an eye on the engines:
View attachment 44042
The noise would have been something else, but they'd have been kept nice & cool (aircrew and motors):
View attachment 44043
Most of the way you can see the Nile (which is, of course, our destination airport) below:
View attachment 44044
The British relationship with Egypt was rather complicated. Technically it was supposed to be an 'Anglo-French Condominium', though the French never did much more than a bit of catering there, having bottled out of the original invasion in 1884. In theory Egypt was still part of the Ottoman Empire till WW1, but of course power lay with the British Governor-General, the Egyptian Khedive being a figurehead, like a British monarch. Just as today's superpower wants everybody in the world to be a democratic republic (it works for us, so it must be right), so the British set up constitutional monarchies everywhere. Who do you think decided that countries like Jordan and Saudi Arabia should be ruled by a 'king'?