• There seems to be an up tick in Political commentary in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site we know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religiours commentary out of the fourms.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politicion will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment amoung members. It is a poison to the community. We apprciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

iniBuilds P-40F WarHawk Released

Happy Christmas all

Took the plunge on this one today.

I really like the model. In fact I thought ITB was a bit harsh in his review.

My only issues at the moment are take off handling and elevator trim response.

I cant find any reference in the manual to suggested trim settings for the aircraft on take off - it just says "as required". Can anyone suggest a combination that works pls?

On trim - ITB made passing refence in his UTube episode to the trim not being over responsive but I really struggle to get the trim to respond at all - find myself pulling back on the stick to achieve level flight because the trim is not responding.

Grateful for any help/suggestions folks.

Thanks
 
Absolutely rediculous (and this is from their frontpage and all ! ) :

rediculous.jpg


Contradictio in terminis ? Paradox ? Hogwash that's for sure. Who'd ever think it would come to this. They could've just put a stork in there or a squirrel. Makes a mockery of our precious flightsim hobby and this great looking P-40 model in the first place. Don't they *know* that at Inibuilds ??? ( what the hell, little Xbox boys don't know what the're looking at anyway.... saves us time and effort to create a suitable pilot figure )

Sorry, just needed to blow off steam that's coming from my ears when i see such an abomination. :mixed-smiley-027:
 
Javis said:
Absolutely rediculous (and this is from their frontpage and all ! ) :

rediculous.jpg


Contradictio in terminis ? Paradox ? Hogwash that's for sure. Who'd ever think it would come to this. They could've just put a stork in there or a squirrel. Makes a mockery of our precious flightsim hobby and this great looking P-40 model in the first place. Don't they *know* that at Inibuilds ??? ( what the hell, little Xbox boys don't know what the're looking at anyway.... saves us time and effort to create a suitable pilot figure )

Sorry, just needed to blow off steam that's coming from my ears when i see such an abomination. :mixed-smiley-027:
Click to expand...

Exactly what I have complained about from the beginning. Build an absolutely stunning model, then make you use the female Asobo generic pilot. Bull crap! C'mon iniBuilds, do the right thing and stick the right kind of pilot in the seat! Beyond ridiculous, at least make one and give one the option!

Cazzie
 
I put in a partial fix, I used the modern military Asobo pilot. Still incorrect, but it beats Barbie.

Cazzie
 
Cazzie said:
I put in a partial fix, I used the modern military Asobo pilot. Still incorrect, but it beats Barbie.
Click to expand...

I would think a pilot with a bone dome would be absolutely "correct" for flying a warbird in a non-combat sim. If I want to see WWII pilots, I fire up IL-2 Stalingrad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top