• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Is it exist? And if so...

hubbabubba

Charter Member
:wavey:Hi!

A TV commercial is running here these days that intrigued me for this;
View attachment 49174

Most of the ad is CGI (I doubt that there's a hundred aircraft for real), but the "main character" looks real. It is an all-red (no markings) low inverted gull wings with a tricycle gear (nose wheel is protruding a bit just behind the radial cowling). A "handle" under the tail act as a skid (for precaution I presumed) and a step appears on the left trailing edge. All these details had me thinking; "Wait a minute! This bird is for real!" This is the only picture I could find, sorry!

It looks like a cross-breed between an AT-6 and a Trojan, but I can't identify it. Anyone...?
 
Possibly a Nanchang CJ-6?
:applause: That was quick! Thanks An-225:icon29:!

The cockpit is a bit different, but the general shape and ancillary equipment is there.

P.S.- I was wondering how the heck they could put their hands on a Chinese aircraft. Wikipedia told me;
[h=4]Civilian Use[/h] Due to its inexpensive price and sturdy construction, the CJ-6A is a popular hobby plane. A used CJ-6 in the United States can cost as little as $75,000.[SUP][3][/SUP] The aircraft appears on the civil register of the USA, Australia, UK, South Africa and other countries.
 
I could go for the Yak 52 if it was not for the tail. Compare those two pictures;

Nanchang CJ-6
n6354y_nanchang_cj_6.jpg


and Yak 52
Yak-52_RIAT2007_2414_800.jpg


The Yak has a rudder that goes under the horizonal fins-elevators plane, the Nanchang rudder stops over, like in the above picture of my first post. Canopies can be changed over time, but structural modifications, like the tail in this case, are less frequent. Both have steps on the left wing trailing edge, and both have safety skids shaped like a handle.

I would take any one of them quite frankly. They both look fun to fly!
 
I would much prefer the Yak, one reason being the rudder extending below the elevators, it adds a LOT of rudder surface that is actually useful in spin recovery! From what I've read doing pre-purchase research (pipe dream lol) the Yak is usually ok in spin recovery, but can be a real mongrel to get out of a power on flat spin, I'd hate to be in a spinning Nanchang! (Of course this is speculation as I haven't read any reports on spinning the CJ-6, but I do love those Yaks :) )
 
Was this the one in one of the Resident Evil movies? I thought that one was a Hollywood creation until I looked it up.
 
Back
Top