Bjoern
worst developer ever
my god americas poor wtf is that its hidious!!
One word NIMROD!!
You're not really saying that the Nimrod is more pleasing to look at than the P-8, are you?
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
my god americas poor wtf is that its hidious!!
One word NIMROD!!
Want to hear something even more peculiar?I am, by no means, that knowledgeable about the subject. But somewhere I read that the Navy had been reluctant to change from turboprop to jet for subhunting, because of the jets ability to maintain a slower speed over a search area? Anyone know more about this?
Thanks.
NC
Hi Folks
navychief -
Nahhhh......
Easy solution,
just do as per the Nimrods
and turn off a couple of engines.
ATB
Paul
Congratulations Ian.Umm...
Are you sure you want to do that
in a 737 derived aircraft?![]()
Ok--- Let´s see some dudes doing their work or about to...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MlxvKPTqHM
and am not taking this pilot to dinner!!! no way!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRDFQQKwaSc&feature=related
Youtube comment said:dear Boeing, fire your P-8 marketing team.
and the Japanese response.................who will make this model????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_liOeEPdjW0&NR=1
...that the updated Orion 2000 would have been a MUCH better platform, but the Boeing was selected instead? Strangely enough, I have heard that it was a better platform and that the main reason the "Posideon" was selected was because the NAVY fliers "wanted a jet".
Mind you, hope I'm wrong-- toadying to the whims of a group because they want to set themselves up for post-military employment is the type of goofy self-interest people seem to be getting away with these days--if the story I heard was true.
I dunno...to me, the Boeing doesn't have the personality or capability (other than high transit speeds) of the Orion.