• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

MAJOR Milviz Updates for 8 Feb, 2011. T-38/Stuka

DAMN! I clean forgot the siren!!!! Of course it will! We're doing two versions of the Stuka: the D (bombs and siren) and the G2 (BIG A$$ guns and no siren or bombs!).
 
krazycolin said:
The T-38 will consist of 3 products... one, T-38A, two, T-38C and finally, both....
Click to expand...

Ahhhhh.... you answered my question for me. VERY interested in a T-38C (I am an avionics tech by trade so I do love a glass cockpit). I suppose you've already been asked a million times when they will be released...?
 
T-38 I think is closer to release than Junkers. So Siren will be work ?

(double post : \ )
 
the siren will work but, while you are in the VC it will just sound like being on a fire engine. it is, after all, the same sound.

Can't say which one will be first, second or third.... just that they will all be top notch quality like the 310....
 
Especially looking forward to the Stuka! Quite some time ago I did flight modeling for a SBD and also a Corsair that had some dive bombing capability with the gear extended. Those test dives, especially against a ship underway in FSX, about as much fun as you can have in a sim!

Cheers: tom
 
Can we expect anything close to this? (AI F-15E from DCS A-10C beta)

547688ScreenShot010r.jpg


Regards, Diego
 
How do I respond to this? If I say no, then what? If I say yes?

The pic you have shown is very pretty but there are quite a few things "off" with it. If you wish to know what they are, please feel free to PM me and I will explain. I am curious, did you take that shot yourself? Or was it off of their website?

Did you see the youtube videos? That shows the VC and some of the systems... Do note however, that those videos are really old and are therefore, seriously out of date.

http://www.youtube.com/user/milvizinc?feature=mhum

Ours will be what it is. Wait and see. There is one thing: I would HIGHLY recommend that you all wait before spending any more money on weapons packages.... (nuff said on THAT one)

Thanks,
 
Defo not another YF23 but that was FSD remember mate! Would like to see some shots of her though Kolin mate!

The renders were somthing else but I'm quilty more than most of begging for better frames, so I won't complain either way!
 
The YF-23 was, and remains, a fine product. True, it had no weapons. Again, true, it used the F/A-18 HUD. Oh yeah, and, true, it was clean. (just as the real one was).... I have never understood exactly what the issue was with the YF-23. It was inexpensive and quite nicely done in that most things on it worked as in the real world version. In the real thing, 80% of the systems were inop. Plus you could eject from it. Maybe it was the anti-piracy thing?

The stuff in DCS is very nice.

I have asked Nick C to do some pics for the planes (not the Stuka) as soon as we hit beta. Which, with any luck, will be tmrw.

You will be updated as and when they show up.

You can have the whole salt shaker... that's not really going to change anything about what's in and what's not.
 
As it turns out, there is NO SIREN on the Stuka D or the G. Oh well...

Sorry about that. I was misinformed.

We MAY put it on anyway... even if it's not correct... what say you all?
 
You HAVE to have a siren-it's the one thing everyone thinks of when you say "Stuka"!

Even if it's an option for one or both models
 
All the info and pics I have show that the D didn't have the siren. It had a bulbous cover that they put on top of the siren. It was thought that the siren gave the planes position away too early and made it (more) of a target.

If you have any pics of a D with a siren... I would be GLAD to see one...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top