• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Maryadi's MV22B Osprey Rel2.0 released

Hello Kalong ,

chapeau ,
ça veut dire / that means :

je retire mon chapeau à votre grande réussite -

I take my hat off to your great achievement

Ulrich-Richard

PS.: I live here in the region Soth Germany -Switzerland - Austria - France
 
Thanks again.

Wow that a nice place, hope I can go there if time permit.

in SIM, I very often fly to Zurich (using TU-144), then take medium aircraft (learjet) heading to LSPM for challenging approach.
 
almost forgot, I redid the spec sheet, seems that the objects on the spec sheet were not aligned to the texture sheets, you can only tell when sunlight hits the fuselage at certain angles. then there would be 2 objects that could be seen, now they are aligned to fit the main texture sheets, minor detail . Thanks again Maryadi

Bill
 
Maryadi, I noticed that you have spec sheets for the interior but no spec sheets for the exterior . Just curious , will the model be able to accept spec sheets for the exterior (is it enabled ?). Trust me I am a novice on these matters . Just curious if a spec sheet could be made and used on the exterior or if there was a reason why you didn't do one.

Bill
 
wow just had a moment, I do have spec sheets for the fuselage , not sure what I was thinking. I guess going over 50 is true lol. no insult to anyone here over 50 .

Bill
 
OK I recovered, I meant to say BUMP maps for the fuselage , you have them for the interior but not the exterior. sorry for the confusion on my part. Im just curious

Bill
 
flewpastu said:
wow just had a moment, I do have spec sheets for the fuselage , not sure what I was thinking. I guess going over 50 is true lol. no insult to anyone here over 50 .

Bill
Click to expand...
None taken ....LoL
I'm 64 and I don't want to scare you .... But it gets worse ......:dizzy:

Cheers, Rob
 
Well, testing of the inverted-flight tanks and systems went as good as expected! Sure could have used a couple of barf-bags. Sorry about the cockpit....I'll clean it up later:encouragement:

attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Osprey inverted.jpg
    Osprey inverted.jpg
    68.7 KB · Views: 11
  • Barf bag needed.jpg
    Barf bag needed.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 11
MrZippy said:
Well, testing of the inverted-flight tanks and systems went as good as expected! Sure could have used a couple of barf-bags. Sorry about the cockpit....I'll clean it up later:encouragement:
Click to expand...
Now try flying inverted at 50-100 knots with nacelles at 60 or so.
You need to switch off the AutoNac and SpecialFeatures buttons when trying ....

PS:
Ohhh.... tried it myself, and just realised (after looking into my code) that I never modelled inverted flight in VSTOL config ... (like I did for all my recent Harriers implementations).
So it looks a bit odd now ...When flying inverted and in STOL config (so part of the thrust is pointing upward instead of downward) altitude still increases instead of falling down like a brick ... LoL
Oh well, next version maybe ...

Although I wonder how a real Osprey will behave doing such a inverted-flight maneuver in Conversion/VTOL config; probably crash immediately ?? (maybe the systems would even prevent such a maneuver, I don't know)

Rob
 
flewpastu said:
OK I recovered, I meant to say BUMP maps for the fuselage , you have them for the interior but not the exterior. sorry for the confusion on my part. Im just curious

Bill
Click to expand...

As I state in fsdeveloper.com, external model not much updated to keep old livery always can used.
Added to my to do list.
 
flewpastu said:
wow just had a moment, I do have spec sheets for the fuselage , not sure what I was thinking. I guess going over 50 is true lol. no insult to anyone here over 50 .

Bill
Click to expand...

Hi Bill,
You're only 'over 50'?! What a kid! Just you wait, it's all downhill once you get to 80! Still got most of my marbles but not as smart or quick as I used to be... But I can (slowly) cope with FS/P3D - even Maryadi's MV-22.
So take heart all you youngsters, if an old f*rt like me can fly it it'll be a doddle for you! :redfire:
 
Nice freded, I’ll keep that in mind lol :jump:

Bill
p.s. I feel old now , what it’s gonna be like if I make it TO 80 LOL
 
Landing lights

In the MV-22B_v1 the landing lights were to be handled with Crtl-L.
What comination is required in the MV-22B_v2 ?
Ctrl + L is not permanent in my case .

NAKE7Bs.jpg




Thanks

Ulrich-Richard
 
Yaw pedal authority

Hi again,

In the hover I seem to have lots of roll authority (I take it due to the lateral thrust layout), reasonable fore-aft but very little yaw pedal, with one-two degrees per sec. Makes maneuvering in the hover quite exciting sometimes!

Tried adjusting the flight dynamics in the normal manner, but I assume these are within the VSTOL gauge?

Any way for me to increase the yaw response please?

Many thanks

Andy
 
andy277uk said:
Hi again,

In the hover I seem to have lots of roll authority (I take it due to the lateral thrust layout), reasonable fore-aft but very little yaw pedal, with one-two degrees per sec. Makes maneuvering in the hover quite exciting sometimes!

Tried adjusting the flight dynamics in the normal manner, but I assume these are within the VSTOL gauge?

Any way for me to increase the yaw response please?

Many thanks

Andy
Click to expand...

Hi Andy,

I have a similar problem: the MV-22 tends to roll to starboard even with no wind and stick calibrated. That too makes the hover hard to control. This happened in Rel1 too. Maybe it’s my system?
Does anyone else have this problem?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top