• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Me-109 bellied in...

I never knew they had wooden props. Did all the 109's have wooden props?

Don

The protoype and all Bf109 A's had a wooden fixed-pitch two-blade prop. After a production run of 30 the Bf109 B was equipped with a metal three-blade variable-pitch prop. Ths was termed the Bf 109 B-1 (unofficially). Some of the earlier machines were rfitted with the variable props.

The Bf 109 B-1 was to see combat in Spain with the Legion Condor.

All subsequent models hat variable-pitch metal propellers.

So in fact all combat models had metal propellers except maybe a few of the 30 early B's which might have been in Spain without having been refitted with a metal prop.

Interesting fact I found out while looking for props: the first proptoype of the 109 had a British Rolls-Royce Kestrel engine - the most powerful engine abailable in it's day! The DB 600 or Jumo 210 were still being developed.

Cheers,
Sascha
 
The plane in the photos is a Bf-109-G4, a later version... according to what was posted in that forum. Since it had a 3 blade wooden prop, I wonder if they modified that prop to have variable pitch capability. I believe the G4 had a DB.605 engine.

BB686:USA-flag:
 
I was reading the comments at the link. The aircraft is owned by EADS so I'm guessing funds for repairs will be available soon. It was interesting to read that EADS took a postwar CASA model and restored it to the original DB605 engine configuration. I suppose that even though the prop was wood they will still have to tear down the engine for inspection. I wonder how many of those engines are still around.
 
This particular aircraft, D-FWME, since leaving the Spanish AF, has had a really terrible string of bad luck. The aircraft, while still in the Spanish AF (still in stock Buchon form), was used in the movie Battle of Britain. Not too long after, in civilian hands, the aircraft was used in the film Patton, dressed to actually look like a high-back Mustang (from far away!), sporting American markings and a temporary belly scoop. However, the aircraft crashed on take-off while the film was being made. In 1986, having been sold to and restored in the U.S., the aircraft crashed on its very first post-restoration take-off. In really horrible state, the aircraft eventually went to Germany in the 90's, where it was rebuilt into G-4 configuration with a DB605 - an incredible amount of work and sum of money went into the rebuild. The aircraft first flew again in 2004, but was severely damaged (one could say 'totaled') less than a year later, when the landing gear collapsed upon landing, which resulted in a violent groundloop. Following extensive rebuild, the aircraft didn't fly again until 2008. Only two weeks after this, however, on approach to landing the right landing gear wouldn't lock down and a wheels-up landing was required. The damage resulting from this incident was far less significant than the 2005 accident, but again it wasn't until almost a whole year later, in 2009, that the aircraft was flying again. This most recent forced landing appears to have had similar, if not better results than the 2008 wheels-up landing, so we should see the aircraft flying again within a year I would suspect.

Unfortunately for EADS, this means that all three of their 109's are currently out of service - the other two include D-FDME, which currently is having engine issues (and still quite fresh out of repairs from a landing gear collapse a few years back), and D-FMBB, which is in long-term overhaul.

All of EADS 109's originate heavily from Spanish-built Hispano HA-1112-M1L airframes, though D-FDME has parts from an original G-10 and is registered as such.

Speaking of the wood props (as you can see in the photos), they are of the modern-production, and in cases such as these they are the type of prop blades that you want.

Regarding the availability of DB605 engines, they were at one time described as being incredibly rare, but in recent years, and with many other Bf-109G and F variants (mostly originals) under restoration to fly in the future, DB605's have seemed to be coming out of the wood work. There are a few companies that specialize in new-build Bf-109 parts, and a few other companies that specialize in new-build DB605 parts and rebuilding DB605 engines, so there is an industry that is present to directly support the restoration and flying operations of these aircraft for years to come.
 
John, sounds like they all suffer from the usual landing gear problems of the Bf 109.
 
The plane in the photos is a Bf-109-G4, a later version... according to what was posted in that forum. Since it had a 3 blade wooden prop, I wonder if they modified that prop to have variable pitch capability. I believe the G4 had a DB.605 engine.

BB686:USA-flag:

I was thinking the same thing. There's no reason why a wooden prop blade could not be incorporated into a variable configuration provided you could determine how to integrate the wooden blade with the metal cams to vary the pitch.

I am surprised they chose to use wood on the blades. Certainly that late a version used aluminum blades as the previously posted comment very accurately discussed!

Ken
 
Back
Top