Me262 over Gloucestershire

Looks very nice Allen, good work there!

haha yes, I too noticed that. On purpose obviously;)

does the a2a me 262 from their power pack work in fs2004?
 
Looks very nice Allen, good work there!

haha yes, I too noticed that. On purpose obviously;)

does the a2a me 262 from their power pack work in fs2004?

CFS2, Yes. CFS3, Nope.


you'll need to remove any CFS2 .dp (damage profile) files and add the UI section in aircraft.cfg file; may also need to adjust the min throttle setting in .cfg file too

ttfn

Pete
 
Most probably the best Me262 models are the payware ones by Flight Replicas. The model is not available at the Flight Replicas site anymore, but there are still some re-sellers who offer these models.

p0j7LP1.jpg


pi5deK2.jpg

My favourite repaint, for the reconnaissance version by TonyG

There are also some freeware models, but it seems most of these are based at the old CFS2 model from VB_planes model by Graham.

GXDJxCc.jpg

A coversion to FS2004 by Warrant

TuXn7fG.jpg

A "Pulkzerstörer" with 50 mm Cannon by A.F. Scrub

ZNCP8Tb.jpg

A "normal" Ms262 A-1 by the same author
 
There are several versions of the same nightfighter, based on the VB_planes model. There is one by Erwin "Bavarian" Welker and a very similar one by Warrant.

This is the version by Warrant with a livery done by me, which was never uploaded.
0HwDhR7.jpg


And there is original model done by Pierre Marchadier, Gilles Mercier, Jean-Pierre Langer and Benoit Dube

qJErPum.jpg


Morten did a huge texture package for this model. Perhaps not the best model, but easy on the framerates, which is why I use it as AI.

And there are several sweptback wing versions by various authors. Perhaps the best know one is done by Ito-San, but there are several others.

All freeware models are quite basic and definitely show their age. Perhaps a certain person from the south of the UK can bring change this. Or just spend roughly $20 and purchace the Flight Replicas one, which I can recommend.

Cheers,
Huub
 
Huub,
many thanks for your input here. Somehow, it seems that I have missed TonyG's contributions to the FR stable altogether, so I will be correcting that omission today,
thanks again,
Ro

:encouragement:
 
Hahaha, knowing Shessi I'm sure he will put it on his list. But I'm also pretty sure his list is much longer than he can finish in one life time :biggrin-new:

Cheers,
Huub
 
Ha ha ha..don't you know it Huub!

Alex, I appreciate what you ask, and yes there are several projects of 262's, somewhere in the project dungeons.

As Huub's shown, there are some ok versions to use, but by far the best looking and most accurate are the 262A and B by Mike Flahault/Flight Replicas. Back in 2008, I helped Mike with a lot of detailed photos of the South African Me262B night fighter, so know that the B model is very accurate. The problem is finding both versions for Fs2004!

Cheers

Shessi
 
I agree, the flight replicas model is the most accurate currently, but that should stop others from creating a more detailed version. Allen has been doing a good job on his me262 and we should encourage him to continue it.

and shessi your models have always been top notch with great detail. A modern replica would be nice to have, with detailing on the engines, updated modern antennas, revised cockpit :)
 
Alex I understand what you are saying, but I wonder whether it is really worth the effort, as the modern Flugwerks Me262 replica was designed to be as close to the original as possible.

To see how close, here a nice video, which will also bring us closer to the original subject of the thread......

Cheers,
Huub

 
Nope. General Electric CJ610

The combat Jumo 004 had restrictions on materials they could be built from so they did badly but the prototypes that didn't have material restrictions did as well as can be expected of Jet engines from that era IIRC.

The Flying Heritage Collection was trying to get there original 262 flying with I'm guessing is all new reproduction 004 and it looks like back in 2019 it was rolling around using them.

FHC is trying to get the 262 flying with the original 004s. Kind of. While the architecture of the engine is identical to the original (they are using the original engine casings) all of the internals have been remade to original specs but with modern materials. (Thank you Paul Allen.) I also believe they plan on using all original style fuel controls and not doing something like popping in a FADEC system to run the engine. So, it will still behave and sound just like it did back in the 40's, but have vastly improved reliability and time between overhauls. The replicas use J-85 engines with a bit of trickery to disguise them at the front. (The spike used for regulating the area of the tailpipe of the original is notably absent though.) Replica or real, I'd still be happy to see either in the air! Collings Foundation has one but I don't know how often they fly it.
 
Alex I understand what you are saying, but I wonder whether it is really worth the effort, as the modern Flugwerks Me262 replica was designed to be as close to the original as possible.

To see how close, here a nice video, which will also bring us closer to the original subject of the thread......

Cheers,
Huub

At least I got some cool renders out of things.image.png

nbLPZLq.png


IHNL7xf.png


TnfZnVU.png


L5XQfPv.png
 
Back
Top