Microprose B-17 Preview

[tiger1962]

Personally I never have, do not, and never will pay ANY attention to what some self-important prick on YouTube thinks about anything.

 

[Snuffy]

Personally I never have, do not, and never will pay ANY attention to what some self-important prick on YouTube thinks about anything.

Whether he/she/it has a video or not included.

 

[tiger1962]

Whether he/she/it has a video or not included.

All of those videos are way too long-winded and self-indulgent for me - just cut to the god-damned chase, @sshole. I haven't got all day.
And when they DO finally get round to it, it's something YOU'VE known for donkey's years - who are these people, feckin noobs?

 

[Priller]

Okok guys! Loved the comments, but let's get back on topic, shall we?

And yes, it was me who started going on about AvAngel, but it was a remark on the side.

Jan

 

[Tom Clayton]

This is about a B-17 though...so I was a bit taken aback by the sudden swerve toward critiquing a YT presenter in the middle of it - one who frequents this forum - and I said only that there is a place set aside especially for that, right where the presenter would expect it to be and nothing more or less than that.

Couldn't have said it better myself!

A few notes... Is AvAngel a bit biased for or against one dev vs another? Sure! But then so is every other user on this board, whether they admit it or not. Does that come through in her videos? She wouldn't Human if it didn't. But at least she tries to show the good and bad for each plane she reviews. The reason I post her vids here is because they're shorter than so many other <cough>Jonathan Beckett</cough> reviewers. And as suggested here, when you post questions on her videos, she's likely to answer within a day or two. She almost always has with me at least.

Now, for the love of whatever deity you believe in, and before I have to get out that smelly wet asbestos blanket, let's get back to the bomber with the weird Alcoa interior.

Personally, I'm still waiting to see the "modern" flight deck...

 

[Snuffy]

Personally, I'm still waiting to see the "modern" flight deck...

Oh sorry you said "modern"

Somewhere in all this clutter, https://discord.com/channels/681523353651249174/1252617042146623548 they mention a "modern" office setting.

 

[Tom Clayton]

Somewhere in all this clutter

Which is why Discord lives up to its name, and why I don't use it.

 

[Navy Chief]

Which is why Discord lives up to its name, and why I don't use it.

I have Discord, but only visit it to follow updates on add-ons like Virtual.Desktop, and the progress of add-ons like the future A-7E for DCS, which will probably get released after I am no longer breathing.

 

[heywooood]

Which is why Discord lives up to its name, and why I don't use it.

'Discourse' would have been the more polite approach - less invocative of unresolved conflicting opinions...but then

 

[Snuffy]

Which is why Discord lives up to its name, and why I don't use it.

Pretty sure the creators of this knew exactly what they were doing.

 

[Tom Clayton]

'Discourse' would have been the more polite approach - less invocative of unresolved conflicting opinions...but then

Discourse is actually the name of the software that powers the MS official forum.