michael davies
Charter Member 2012
This is interesting. I never lined up the first external comparison correctly so the versions were not seen at exactly the same angle.
I have taken more time to get the camera angle much the same for both at the same distance. Its now harder to tell the difference.
![]()
Nice comparison, the lower one has a deeper nose at the windscreen base and the correct flat top to the intake (not the variable intake part) which reduces the amount of fuselage seen between the intake top and canopy rail, however the upper one is more correct with the upper part of the elevon support structure beam under the fin, it is one sweeping slightly curved upper surface, the lower has a pronounced fall off toward the rear, yet the lower one is more correct on the bottom section of this structure.
I'd buy both anyway....if I hadn't just blown all my Xmas bonus on machine tools for my 'other' hobby LOL.
