Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Just when you think you have everything running some what better...
You get a message from the Hosting company. Short story they need to move us to a new server. I have been working with them to plan a good date for all concerned. Here is what we have come up with as a schedule.
If all goes well we should be back online on November 8th.
To keep you updated we will post updates on AVSIM forums.
Thank you for your support.
Need a second opinion, the windscreen "appears" to be more upright in stature or is it the much larger curve ( C-UXPA ) coming off of the upper corner that's making the difference compared to the default DHC2 ??
Aircanuck
On closer inspection, I can see a number of issues. The nose section of the aircraft appears to be too short. The engine cowling and the bulkhead area is too short. Along with the misplaced a pillar, this gives the aircraft a side-on appearance of being squashed. The undercarriage fairings also appear to be too wide from front to back, though this may be an illusion caused by the too short nose and the tundra-style tyres in the shots...
The DHC-2 is one of those iconic aircraft, like the DC-3. I would love to see it "got right"...
A
Andrew Entwistle
I hope they do not fall into the 'midget pilot' trap..
![]()
Milviz says that they are fixing the windshield and nose ...