• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Milviz Updates 24 Oct 2010, T-38 Unveiling!

Since you asked, I'd still love to see a beautiful P-40E. I'm sure MilViz could do a superb job on this. I'd like to see one that's of the caliber of some of the latest FSX models that have been introduced lately.

I second that!

Naval aircraft? I see you have a model of a Zero .... a Sea Fury would also be nice
 
The E-2C was one of the 1st models I did for Colin/Milviz, and it would be nice to see it in FSX! I can give you some good tips on poly reduction if ya want. I have found some nice techniques that work good and fast, and also keeps the UVW mapping intact. :salute:
 
a Sea Fury would also be nice

I would love to see a good Sea Fury. I had started one, and even got in contact with the owner of two Reno Fury's and he agreed to let me use them as referances (get in, take pix) but it never went anywhere since I got the job at Aces soon after and I moved too Washington. Would love to pick it up again, but im way too busy with my full time job. That and the F8F/F7F are the apex of piston engine fighters!
 
That and the F8F/F7F are the apex of piston engine fighters!

I would have to add the P-51H and F-82 to that list. ;) Oh, how I do wish we had an F-82 as well.

The T-38 looks great. A dedicated FSX F-5E would be great as well, but I do understand the differences are somewhat substantial.
 
Well, at any rate, the number of models available to Milviz shouldn't be a limiting factor throughout the next year :jump:
 
Back to the T-38C for a sec. . . .I'm only mentioning this as an "is this correct?" question and not something that must be implemented. The last Egress Conference I attended in 2006 featured the folks from Martin Baker and besides the normal stuff they were showing (The JPATS Seat System and the F-35 Seat. . .very plush by the way) they also were recruiting personnel to begin the mods to all USAF T-38's for the new Martin Baker Ejection System. That was to start in late 2006 at Laughlin for about 18 months and then moving from base to base thereafter to complete the remaining Talons. The current seat showing in the early modeling isn't the MB (yes I know that's the "A" model). Will that change for the "C" model?
 
We have a lot planned for the T-38C model. While the ejection seat is not one of the things that has been discussed so far. We are well aware of the re-design of the engine intakes, exhaust ducts, and other changes that were made to the internal/external. Those will all be modeled. I like all the aircraft suggestions by the way.. F-7F and P-51H are definately neglected birds when it comes to MSFS.
 
We have a lot planned for the T-38C model. While the ejection seat is not one of the things that has been discussed so far. We are well aware of the re-design of the engine intakes, exhaust ducts, and other changes that were made to the internal/external. Those will all be modeled. I like all the aircraft suggestions by the way.. F-7F and P-51H are definately neglected birds when it comes to MSFS.

are you awhare of the milton and crew built F7F over in the 2004 forum?..it will be FSX as well,and it is also an airtanker as well as the fighter...looks as sexy as it should
 
WHAT?

Whatchya mean Rattler?

Incase Anyone Missed it, That was a Joke, I`m Sure He is Very Good At what he Does, I have the B-1B from Milviz and I Am very Happy with that Bird, I am looking forward to the F-15 Set and the forementioned T-38, Again, I was trying to be Funny, I guess It didnt Work.... :kilroy::kilroy::kilroy:
 
REALLY?

er.... we didn't do the B-1B.... that was Alphasim....

oh well.. .back to not knowing...

Virtavia, Oh My, Sorry about that...... I Promise to Buy Something from Milviz The F-15 and T-38 are On the Books For me!!! P.S. Nice Camel toe :bump:
 
Wow !

Any potential release dates for both T-38A and T-38C Talons ?
Will it be a pawware ?
If yes, any price range indications ?

Its already on my "to buy" priority list.

Hoping that "Nasa" and "USNTPS" colors will be chosen for the Milviz
initial package.
:ernae:
VaporZ
 
Indeed

Nasa Paints would be great And All the Training Commands, Beal, Holloman, And Whiteman I think it is, Am I missing Anyothers?
 
I would absolutely love to see it freeware. The UKMIL T-38 isn't relly easy on frames for my rig, and I am having some issues with the new FSD T-38. Freeware would make my day!:jump:
 
Yes absolutely. Make it Freeware please.
And then come and clean my house and take the dogs out for a walk :icon_lol:
 
Everything that we do is payware. We really try to keep the cost low. It really comes down to us paying for the programs we use (3DS Max), and paying to cover all the stuff that we subcontract out (such as sounds to T.S.S., coding, etc). While we have not set a price yet I would expect it to be close in range to the 310. We are going to start selling products straight from our site hopefully starting with the T-38. So that will give us more flexibility in deciding the final prices.
 
Back
Top