MSMP "Compatible" Doesn't Necessarily Mean 100% Compatible

F

FAC257

SOH-CM-2025
With the new update and the MSMP steps forward I decided to start from scratch, with a fresh clean re-install of MSFS2024. With the MSMP GUI still being so convoluted I went with re-installing only those items that I've purchased that were marked as compatible.

Turns out that doesn't mean they are actually 100% working correctly. So far, I've found that the Pasped Skylark marked as compatible, still doesn't have gauges.
Also, Vertical Sims Plant City Airport (KPCM), also marked as compatible, still has an issue with all of the airport buildings being sunk in the ground so that only their roofs show. Another one, I hope someone has an answer for is the T-33 still only has the goofy default pilot and not the pair of mil-pilots it had originally.

Makes me wonder what they are using as the criteria for attaching the "Compatible" label.


Forest
 
There are some weirdnesses in 2024 in trying any port over. As a fun exercise I did new flight dynamics for the Blackbird FG1D Corsair. It flys well but if one mouses the canopy open all the instruments freeze for the rest of the flight. Note that there is no binding command in 2024 for open close canopy.
 
fliger747 said:
There are some weirdnesses in 2024 in trying any port over. As a fun exercise I did new flight dynamics for the Blackbird FG1D Corsair. It flys well but if one mouses the canopy open all the instruments freeze for the rest of the flight. Note that there is no binding command in 2024 for open close canopy.
Click to expand...
On the positive side, I got a notifcation thru the MSMP that FlyMex's Cozumel MMCZ had been updated from its previous "Compatible" designation but with missing terminal buildings. It's still listed as Compatible, but now the missing building are there. LOL


Forest
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top